Tuesday, January 20, 2026

When Muhammad Rejected by Rabbis, He Turned Against Them

When Muhammad Rejected by Rabbis, He Turned Against Them

When Muhammad Rejected by Rabbis, He Turned Against Them

To understand why Western civilization developed so differently from much of the Islamic world, it helps to understand early Islamic history.

Islamic tradition says that in the early 600s, Muhammad began preaching in Mecca. For roughly a dozen years, his message gained only a small following—mostly close family members and loyal friends—while facing strong opposition from local leaders.

After that period, Muhammad migrated to Medina (the Hijra). Medina was home to influential Arab tribes and significant Jewish communities, and it was a major commercial and political center. During this time, Muhammad’s changed his teachings to include many references that sounded familiar to Jews and Christians—often called “People of the Book, but there was no book.” This is one reason people notice similarities between Judaism and Islam, such as dietary restrictions, structured daily prayer, and fasting traditions.

However, when key Jewish groups in Medina did not accept Muhammad’s prophetic authority, tensions escalated. The relationship shifted from dialogue to political conflict and military confrontation. From that point forward, Islam was no longer only a spiritual movement; it also became a governing and military force, shaping law, society, and expansion.

As Islamic rule spread, Jews and Christians were often allowed to remain within Islamic states, but typically as protected minorities under specific legal limits. In many historical periods, this included paying the jizya (a poll tax) in exchange for protection and permission to practice their religion—though how this worked varied widely by place and time. Jews had to wear a star, and Christians had to wear a belt. Also, news could not blow the Shofar, and Christians could not ring the church bells. Basically, Jews and Christians were second-class citizens and were considered dirty. They could not walk on the same side of the street with a Muslim and would have to cross the street.

Islam continued to expand rapidly beyond Arabia, reaching the Levant and eventually Jerusalem. By the late 11th century, Christian rulers in Europe viewed Muslim control of key Holy Land sites—and reports of hardships faced by Christian pilgrims and Eastern Christians—as a crisis. In 1095, Pope Urban II called on Western Christians to go east in an armed pilgrimage to aid fellow Christians and to reclaim Jerusalem. That appeal became the First Crusade.

The Crusades were not originally launched as a random campaign to convert Muslims; their stated purpose was to defend Christian communities and recover Holy Land territory, especially Jerusalem. The Crusaders captured Jerusalem in 1099 and held it for less than a century. In 1187, Saladin (Salah al-Din) defeated Crusader forces and Jerusalem returned to Muslim rule after the Siege of Jerusalem (1187).

Crusading efforts continued for generations, but by the late 1200s, the Crusader states in the region largely collapsed. Meanwhile, Islamic empires expanded across North Africa and into parts of Europe—most notably the Muslim-ruled territories of the Iberian Peninsula known as al-Andalus—and eastward across parts of Asia through successive dynasties and conquests.

In many regions under Islamic rule, Jews and Christians were permitted to remain as protected religious minorities, but often under legal limits and with the requirement to pay the jizya, a tax historically levied on non-Muslim subjects.

Ottoman expansion into Central Europe reached its high point in the 1600s, culminating in the 1683 siege of Vienna. The siege was lifted in September 1683, and that moment is often treated as a major turning point in the long European pushback against Ottoman expansion.

After World War I and the breakup of the Ottoman Empire, Turkey abolished the caliphate on March 3, 1924 as part of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk’s secular reforms. Those reforms included major legal and social changes, including expanding women’s civil rights and restricting certain traditional religious institutions.

As for Jerusalem in the modern era: Israel captured East Jerusalem (including the Old City) in 1967 during the Six-Day War. 

Truth News by Teresa Morin






Wednesday, January 14, 2026

The Left’s Double Standard: Trump’s Action, Obama’s Air War

The Left’s Double Standard: Trump’s Action, Obama’s Air War

Obama’s Air War: Bombings in Iraq & Syria (2014–2016)

People throw fits over Trump, but stayed quiet when Obama’s Iraq–Syria bombing campaign ran 3 years—long-lasting damage, thousands of strikes, real lives taken. 

Obama’s Air War: Bombings in Iraq & Syria (2014–2016) vs. trump with only 20 men stopped venezuela and arrested Moduro


What is all the fuss that Trump went into Venezuela with only 20 men and finished the job in a couple of hours and arrested Maduro. 

Let's look at what Obama did?

Total coalition munitions in Iraq+Syria during 2014–2016: 65,731 weapons released. 

Obama did airstrikes against Syria and Iraq. Let's look at the numbers.

  • 2014: 6,591

  • 2015: 21,116

  • 2016: 21,181
    (Total 2014–2016: 48,888)

Could Obama done the same with Syria like Trump did with Venesuela? I believe so. So, why all the loud mouths crying what Trump did? I can tell you why? The leftists are misinformed and want socialism and lose freedom. They been told differently, but they have been lied to.

A few big, documented reasons you saw louder outrage at Trump while a lot of Obama-era bombing (and drone war) drew less sustained mass protest—especially from the left:

Partisanship changes who mobilizes

Research on the U.S. anti-war movement found that activism dropped sharply after Democrats won the White House, even though major war policies continued—basically a “party victory” demobilized the street movement.

 
That doesn’t mean no one criticized Obama; it means fewer people showed up consistently when “their team” was in power.

Obama wasn’t “quiet”—but the backlash looked different

There was public skepticism about Syria strikes under Obama (including among Democrats), but it often showed up as polling opposition and inside-DC debate, not constant viral outrage. For example, Pew found the public was broadly against Syria airstrikes in 2013.

Media environment: Trump coverage was uniquely polarized and constant

Pew’s media study found Trump coverage was shaped heavily by a polarized media ecosystem and audience sorting—meaning stories and reactions amplified faster and harder along partisan lines.

Style, symbolism, and “how it’s done” matters politically

Even when actions overlap (airstrikes, drones, deportations, etc.), people react differently to:

  • tone and rhetoric

  • how decisions are communicated

  • whether it feels chaotic vs. procedural
    That affects how much energy activist networks, donors, and media give an issue.

Transparency and accountability fights were real—but unevenly applied

Obama expanded/normalized parts of the targeted-killing/drone framework; critics argued Congress and much of Washington applied little pressure for reforms.
And investigative reporting tallied large numbers of strikes and civilian-death allegations that fueled criticism—again, often more in reports than in mass protest.

Bottom line

A lot of the “why are they throwing a fit now?” comes down to partisan double standards + a more polarized, high-octane media era under Trump—not because Obama had no critics, but because the volume and visibility of the backlash differed. 

By: Teresa Morin, Truth News





Friday, January 9, 2026

Russia and China Attempts to Ruin America through Venezuela Government

Russia and China Attempts to Ruin America through Venezuela Government

Russia and China propped up Maduro with loans, weapons, oil deals, and tech—blocking U.S. pressure and prolonging Venezuela’s crisis for years deeply.

Russia and China Attempts to Ruin America through Venezuela Government


Russia's Attempt to Ruin America

Russia’s support for Venezuela wasn’t usually framed by Moscow as “ruin America,” but U.S. officials and many analysts saw it as Russia helping Caracas resist U.S. pressure and keep a hostile-to-Washington government afloat in the Western Hemisphere.

Here’s what Russia provided (with the clearest, documented examples and dates):

1) Weapons, air defense, and military support

  • Arms purchases financed by Russian loans (mid-2000s–2009): Venezuela became Russia’s biggest arms customer in the region, buying major systems with Russian financing. Universidad de Navarra+1

  • 2009: ~$2B Russian loan for arms (Reuters reported the loan tied to purchases like tanks and advanced air defenses). Reuters

  • Military “specialists/advisers” deployed (2019): Reuters reported Russia sent “specialists” to Venezuela under military cooperation arrangements, which the U.S. publicly warned about. Reuters+1

  • Private security contractors (2019): Reuters reported Kremlin-linked contractors associated with the Wagner network helped guard Maduro. Reuters+1

2) Strategic military signaling near the U.S.

  • Strategic bomber visits: Russia flew Tu-160 bombers to Venezuela in 2008, 2013, and Dec 2018—high-visibility deployments widely interpreted as “messaging” to Washington. Military Times+1

3) Money lifelines: loans + debt restructuring

  • Debt restructuring (Nov 2017): Russia restructured $3.15B of Venezuelan debt over 10 years with minimal payments early—effectively giving Caracas breathing room. Reuters+1

  • Loans/credit since 2006: Reporting and analysis describe Russia (government + Rosneft) as a “lender of last resort,” with multi-billion support over time. Voice of America+1

4) Oil-sector backing that helped Venezuela keep exporting under sanctions

  • Rosneft investments/advances: Reuters calculated Rosneft poured about $9B into Venezuela projects since 2010 (and sought repayment through oil flows/structures). Reuters

  • Keeping oil moving after U.S. sanctions (2019): Reuters reported Rosneft trading units handled a large share of Venezuela’s exports in 2019, helping PDVSA continue shipments when many buyers avoided it. Reuters

  • Supplying diluents like naphtha (2019 and again in 2025): Venezuela needs diluents to blend extra-heavy crude. Reuters reporting shows Russian naphtha exports to Venezuela (notably discussed again in Dec 2025). Reuters+2Reuters+2

5) Diplomatic cover against U.S. action

  • UN Security Council veto (Feb 2019): Russia (with China) vetoed a U.S.-drafted UNSC resolution on Venezuela. Security Council Report+1

The “so what” (in plain terms)

Russia helped Venezuela survive longer by providing:

  • hard power (weapons, advisers, security),

  • financial oxygen (loans + debt relief),

  • oil logistics and inputs (trading + naphtha/diluents),

  • international protection (UN actions),

…all of which blunted U.S. leverage and made it harder for U.S. policy to isolate Maduro. Reuters+2Reuters+2

China's Attempt to Ruin America

What China did for Venezuela

1) Gave Venezuela huge oil-backed financing (the “oil-for-loans” lifeline)

  • Starting in 2007, China (especially China Development Bank) set up large joint funds/loan facilities where Venezuela repaid with oil shipments. The Dialogue+1

  • Multiple credible trackers (Inter-American Dialogue–based work) put Chinese lending to Venezuela at ~$62B+ over the 2000s–2010s (depending on the date range used). The Dialogue+2Americas Quarterly+2

  • Example of the later phase: in 2015, Maduro announced a $5B disbursement from a $10B oil-backed facility. China Global Development Dashboard

Why that mattered to the U.S.: it helped Caracas stay afloat financially when markets and later sanctions cut off normal funding.


2) Kept buying Venezuelan crude (and helped it keep moving even when sanctioned)

  • China was a major outlet for Venezuelan heavy crude for years, including during sanction periods, often through trading/renaming/re-routing tactics that show up repeatedly in sanctions-evasion reporting. Reuters+1

Why that mattered to the U.S.: oil exports are Venezuela’s main cash engine—buyers reduce U.S. leverage.


3) Gave diplomatic cover against U.S. pressure

  • U.S. government reporting notes that in UN discussions, Russia and (to a lesser extent) China supported Maduro, contributing to blocked/ineffective UN action. EveryCRSReport

Why that mattered to the U.S.: it reduced international isolation and helped Maduro resist regime-change pressure.


4) Provided “state control” technology (ZTE + the Fatherland Card)

  • Reuters documented that China’s ZTE helped Venezuela build the “Carnet de la Patria” system—a national ID/social benefits platform that can be used to monitor and pressure citizens. Reuters

  • Think tanks and U.S. testimony describe it as part of a broader “digital authoritarian” toolkit that strengthened the regime’s internal control. CSIS+1

Why that mattered to the U.S.: stronger internal control made Maduro harder to dislodge and reduced the effectiveness of external pressure.


A simple timeline

  • 2007–2010: China–Venezuela joint funds / big oil-backed credit ramps up. The Dialogue+1

  • 2014–2015: After the oil price crash, China still provides major financing; 2015 includes a $10B oil-backed facility with a $5B first disbursement reported. China Global Development Dashboard+1

  • 2016–2019: China remains a key crude outlet; sanctions-evasion tactics around shipping/trading show up in reporting. Reuters+1

  • 2018: Reuters exposes ZTE’s role in the Fatherland Card system. Reuters

So, “how did this undermine America” (in practical terms)?

  1. Money + oil outlet = less U.S. leverage.

  2. Diplomatic backing = less international isolation.

  3. Control tech = Maduro stayed in power longer, making U.S. pressure less effective. EveryCRSReport+2Reuters+2

Sunday, December 21, 2025

Why does Iran say Israel has no right to exist?

Why does Iran say Israel has no right to exist?

Why does Iran say Israel has no right to exist?


Short Video Part 1

Short Video Part 2

Church Wake Up - Muslims Wake Up and Learn to Love and Accept Jesus

For Iran’s regime, Israel blocks Islamic control of Jerusalem and represents Western influence in the Middle East. Opposing Israel isn’t just politics—it’s ideology,  Since Iran has no religious City like Saudi Arabia.

That’s why Iran funds proxy groups like Hezbollah and Hamas to destroy and kill Every Jew in Israel and worldwide, second Christians. They fight Israel for Iran, without Iran risking direct war. This is a strategy—using proxies to fight a bigger enemy. 

Iran Islam, Shiites, that believes Prophet Muhammad designated his cousin and son-in-law, Ali ibn Abi Talib, as his rightful successor and the first Imam (spiritual leader). Their core difference from Sunni Islam lies in this succession, emphasizing Ali and his descendants (Ahl al-Bayt) as the true sources of religious guidance.  

Israel is in its land and Jerusalem belongs to Israel and not to any Muslim. Remember, Britain gave the land to Israel. Muslims have land all through the middle East. God promised that the Jews would return to Israel. 

If you’re searching spiritually right now, don’t miss the prayer at the end—God loves you and Jesus saves. If you are a muslim, pray this prayer of salvation since Jesus Christ is God and is the only way to salvation. It is a free gift. Allah cannot guarantee your salvation but Jesus can. Prayer of Salvation for Muslims “Father God, I come to You right now with an open heart. I ask You to reveal the truth to me. I believe Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, who died for my sins and rose again. Jesus, I turn away from my sins and I place my trust in You alone to save me. Forgive me, cleanse me, and make me new. I renounce every false refuge, every fear, and every bondage, and I surrender my life to You. Fill me with Your Holy Spirit. Lead me into truth, protect me, and help me follow You every day. In Jesus’ name, amen.” If you prayed that: Say out loud: “Jesus is Lord.” Then begin reading the Gospel of John, and ask God daily: “Jesus, show me who You are.”

Wake Up News

Teresa Morin

Saturday, December 20, 2025

30 different Qurans Until Cairo Decided on One Copy

30 different Qurans Until Cairo Decided on One Copy

DATES FOR THE CANONICAL QIRĀ’ĀT & RIWAYĀT

As you can see from these dates, these people never met Muhammad. 

Nāfiʿ al-Madanī (Qirā’a)

  • Nāfiʿ: d. 169 AH / 785 CE

  • Active in Medina

  • His readings crystallized late 2nd AH, written down 3rd AH

Riwayāt

  • Warsh ʿan Nāfiʿ

    • Warsh (ʿUthmān b. Saʿīd): d. 197 AH / 812 CE

    • Written transmission: early–mid 3rd AH (9th c.)

  • Qālūn ʿan Nāfiʿ

    • Qālūn (ʿĪsā b. Mīnā): d. 220 AH / 835 CE

    • Written transmission: mid 3rd AH

  • Isḥāq ʿan Nāfiʿ

    • Minor/early transmitter, late 2nd–early 3rd AH


Ibn Kathīr al-Makkī (Qirā’a)

  • Ibn Kathīr: d. 120 AH / 737 CE

  • Mecca

  • One of the earliest reciters

Riwayāt

  • Al-Bazzī: d. 250 AH / 864 CE

  • Qunbul: d. 291 AH / 904 CE

  • Written/systematized: 3rd AH


Abū ʿAmr al-Baṣrī (Qirā’a)

  • Abū ʿAmr: d. 154 AH / 770 CE

  • Basra

Riwayāt

  • Ad-Dūrī: d. 246 AH / 860 CE

  • As-Sūsī: d. 261 AH / 875 CE

  • Written transmission: mid–late 3rd AH


Ibn ʿĀmir ad-Dimashqī (Qirā’a)

  • Ibn ʿĀmir: d. 118 AH / 736 CE

  • Syria (Damascus)

Riwayāt

  • Hishām: d. 245 AH / 859 CE

  • Ibn Dhakwān: d. 242 AH / 856 CE

  • Written transmission: 3rd AH


ʿĀṣim ibn Abī an-Najūd (Qirā’a)

  • ʿĀṣim: d. 127 AH / 744 CE

  • Kufa

Riwayāt

  • Ḥafṣ ʿan ʿĀṣim

    • Ḥafṣ: d. 180 AH / 796 CE

    • Became dominant only after Cairo 1924

    • Written form fixed 3rd–4th AH

  • Shuʿbah: d. 193 AH / 809 CE


Ḥamzah az-Zayyāt (Qirā’a)

  • Ḥamzah: d. 156 AH / 772 CE

  • Kufa

Riwayāt

  • Khalaf: d. 229 AH / 844 CE

  • Khallād: d. 220 AH / 835 CE

  • Written transmission: 3rd AH


Al-Kisā’ī (Qirā’a)

  • Al-Kisā’ī: d. 189 AH / 805 CE

  • Grammarian + reciter

Riwayāt

  • Abū al-Ḥārith: d. 240s AH / mid-9th c.

  • Ad-Dūrī (same transmitter as Abū ʿAmr): d. 246 AH / 860 CE


Abū Jaʿfar al-Madanī (Qirā’a)

  • Abū Jaʿfar: d. 130 AH / 747 CE

  • Medina

Riwayāt

  • Ibn Wardan: d. 160s AH / late 8th c.

  • Ibn Jammaz: d. 170 AH / 786 CE

  • Written transmission: early 3rd AH


Yaʿqūb al-Ḥaḍramī (Qirā’a)

  • Yaʿqūb: d. 205 AH / 821 CE

  • Basra

Riwayāt

  • Ruways: d. 238 AH / 852 CE

  • Rawḥ: d. 235 AH / 849 CE


Khalaf al-ʿĀshir (Qirā’a)

  • Khalaf: d. 229 AH / 844 CE

  • Also transmitter for Ḥamzah

Riwayāt

  • Isḥāq: d. 286 AH / 899 CE

  • Idrīs: d. 292 AH / 905 CE


“22–30” ADDITIONAL SUB-TRANSMISSIONS

  • Minor canonical paths recognized by later scholars

  • Systematized mainly by Ibn al-Jazarī

    • d. 833 AH / 1429 CE

  • This is where the rounded number “30” comes from in scholarly discussions


TIMELINE SUMMARY (VERY IMPORTANT)

  • Muhammad dies: 11 AH / 632 CE

  • Main Qirā’a figures: 1st–2nd AH (7th–8th c.)

  • Riwayāt transmitters: 2nd–3rd AH (8th–9th c.)

  • Written standardization: 3rd–4th AH (9th–10th c.)

  • Final canon lists: 10th–15th c. CE

  • Global enforcement of Ḥafṣ: Cairo 1924


ONE-SENTENCE TAKEAWAY

The Qur’anic readings were taught orally in the 7th–8th centuries, but their written forms and canonization were fixed centuries later through human scholarly decisions.

When and why Cairo chose it

  • Year: 1924

  • Institution: Al-Azhar–supervised committee (Egypt)

  • Reason:

    • Schools were using different accepted readings

    • Students were marked “wrong” depending on region

    • Printing required a single, uniform text

➡ Cairo standardized one reading for education and printing.


What happened to the others

  • Other canonical readings (Warsh, Qālūn, Dūrī, etc.):

    • Were removed from public schooling

    • No longer printed for mass use

    • Left to academic study only

They were not declared false—they were set aside to enforce uniformity.


Why this matters

  • Ḥafṣ became dominant because of modern printing and policy, not because it was always the only Qur’an

  • Today, about 90% of Muslims use Ḥafṣ ʿan ʿĀṣim

  • Before 1924, multiple readings were commonly used across the Islamic world


What Existed BEFORE Cairo 1924

1. Multiple Canonical Variants

Islamic scholarship recognized:

  • 10 canonical Qirā’āt (recitations)

  • Each with multiple Riwayāt (transmissions)

  • Totaling about 30 recognized textual forms

These were not identical. Differences include:

  • Different words

  • Singular vs plural

  • Verb tense changes

  • Added or missing phrases

  • Changes that affect meaning

All of these were considered valid Qur’an within Islam.

What Happened to the Other Variants?

They were:

  • Removed from schools

  • Banned from public recitation

  • Excluded from printing

  • Destroyed or archived

Egypt did this because:

  • Children were being marked “wrong” in school

  • Teachers disagreed on correct readings

  • There was confusion across Islamic regions

This is documented by Muslim scholars, not critics.

Important Clarification (This Matters)

Muslims often say:

“There is only one Qur’an.”

But historically, the truth is:

  • There were multiple canonical Qur’anic texts

  • Cairo chose ONE for global uniformity

  • Uniformity ≠ original singularity

Standardization happened because differences existed.

1) DID THE ḤAFṢ QUR’AN HAVE GRAMMAR ISSUES?

Yes — according to early Islamic sources themselves.

Why this happened

  • Early Arabic had no vowel marks

  • No dots to distinguish letters (b / t / th / y / n)

  • Grammar was inferred from oral tradition, not the written text

As Arabic grammar later developed, problems were noticed in the written consonantal text (rasm).One-sentence summary

The Cairo edition of 1924 standardized the Qur’an to the single reading of Ḥafṣ ʿan ʿĀṣim, sidelining other previously accepted variants for the sake of uniformity.


 

Friday, December 19, 2025

Jerusalem isn’t just a city—it’s a symbol of power

Jerusalem isn’t just a city—it’s a symbol of power



Why does Iran focus so heavily on Jerusalem when Islam’s two holiest cities—Mecca and Medina—are in Saudi Arabia?

In this video, we break down the real geopolitical and religious rivalry between Iran and Saudi Arabia, and why Jerusalem became the symbolic battleground. Iran does not control any of Islam’s holy cities, while Saudi Arabia holds Mecca and Medina, giving it religious authority in the Sunni Muslim world. To challenge that dominance, Iran elevates Jerusalem as a global Islamic symbol and rallying point.

This explains:
• Why Iran created “Quds Day”
• Why Jerusalem is central to Iran’s rhetoric
• How this rivalry fuels conflict with Israel
• Why peace efforts repeatedly fail

This is not about ordinary people or civilians — it’s about governments, ideology, and power.

▶️ Watch to understand the real reason Jerusalem stays at the center of Middle East conflict.

I’ve created a FREE 12-page overview book that explores questions many people have never been taught about Jesus, salvation, and Islam—from a historical and biblical perspective. Get your free copy - 📘 Download the free book here: 👉 https://www.touchofgod.org/free-books/exposing-islamThis overview explains: • What Islam teaches about Jesus vs the Bible • How salvation differs between Christianity and Islam • Why these beliefs shape modern Middle East conflict • What is rarely discussed in mainstream conversations https://www.touchofgod.org/free-books/exposing-islam

Sunday, November 30, 2025

Is the Kaaba Pagan? What the Bible Would Say

 Is the Kaaba Pagan? What the Bible Would Say

Is the Kaaba Pagan? What the Bible Would Say


1. The Kaaba’s Origins Were Pagan — Even Islamic Sources Admit It

Before Muhammad, the Kaaba in Mecca was a home of 360 pagan idols worshiped by Arabian tribes.
Islamic historian Ibn Ishaq records that Quraysh tribes bowed to idols such as:

  • Al-Lat

  • Al-Uzza

  • Manat

  • Hubal (the chief idol inside the Kaaba)

These gods were worshiped long before Islam existed.

Muhammad did not deny that the Kaaba was pagan.
He said he “restored” it to the religion of Abraham, but no evidence exists that Abraham ever traveled to Mecca. To say, Muhammad had a visitation from Satan to change the true Word of God and to confuse people. 

2. Scripture’s View: A Pagan Shrine Cannot Become Holy

The Bible shows repeatedly that God rejects pagan shrines, altars, stones, groves, and temples — even if someone later claims to “convert” them to the true God.

What the Bible Says About Pagan Shrines

A. God commands pagan worship sites to be destroyed — not rebranded

Deuteronomy 12:2–3

“You shall utterly destroy all the places where the nations served their gods…
Break down their altars, smash their sacred stones…”

God NEVER said to keep pagan temples and “cleanse them for Yahweh.”
He said to destroy them permanently.

B. Mixing paganism with the worship of God is forbidden

Deuteronomy 12:30–31

“Do not inquire about their gods, saying, ‘How do these nations serve their gods? I will do the same.’”

God forbids:

  • using pagan rituals

  • using pagan locations

  • reusing pagan symbols

  • rebranding pagan worship with His name

C. Even if you say it’s to the “true God,” God still rejects it

Israel once tried exactly what Islam claims to do with the Kaaba:

Exodus 32:5
Aaron built a golden calf and said:

“Tomorrow is a feast to Yahweh!”

But God rejected it completely — because it came from pagan worship.

D. High places remained cursed even after “conversion”

Israel tried to keep pagan high places and worship Yahweh there.

God said:

1 Kings 12:31, 2 Kings 23:8
He condemned the “converted” pagan sites even after the idols were removed.

Why?

Because the foundations were pagan.


3. What Muhammad Did With the Kaaba Fits the Pattern of a Syncretized Pagan Shrine

Muhammad:

  • kept the pagan structure

  • kept the pagan rituals (circumambulation, kissing the Black Stone, etc.)

  • kept pagan pilgrimage months

  • kept pagan holy sites

  • removed the idols but kept all the practices

The Bible teaches that this is syncretism, not purification.

The Black Stone: A Major Issue Biblically

Islam teaches the Black Stone will:

  • have eyes

  • have a tongue

  • testify for Muslims on Judgment Day

This directly violates Scripture, which condemns stones used for worship or supernatural purposes.

Leviticus 26:1

“You shall not set up an image or sacred stone… to bow down before it.”

Muslims:

  • kiss the stone

  • touch it for blessings

  • believe it absorbs sins

  • believe it intercedes

Biblically, this is idolatry.


4. What the Bible Would Say About the Kaaba Today

A. It remains a pagan structure with pagan rituals

Even without idols present, the foundations are pagan, and the rituals originate from pre-Islamic worship of many gods.

B. God never instructed Abraham or any prophet to build or use it

There is zero Scriptural evidence that:

  • Abraham traveled to Arabia

  • Abraham built a shrine in Mecca

  • Abraham performed Hajj rituals

  • Abraham used a Black Stone

  • Abraham circled buildings

  • Abraham kissed stones

Islamic claims contradict Scripture.

C. God rejects worship directed toward pagan geography

God chose:

  • Jerusalem, not Mecca

  • Mount Zion, not the Kaaba

Psalm 132:13–14

“For the LORD has chosen Zion… This is my resting place forever.”


5. In Biblical Terms: The Kaaba Is Idolatry

Based on Scripture:

  • It is a pagan temple repurposed but not redeemed

  • Its rituals are pagan in origin

  • The Black Stone is a forbidden sacred stone

  • Bowing toward it is idolatry

  • Muhammad’s cleansing of idols does NOT change its foundation

The Bible is extremely clear:

You cannot take a pagan shrine and make it holy.

God destroys pagan shrines — He does not allow people to repurpose them.

The Bible warns that anyone who preaches a different gospel than the one already given should be "accursed" or condemned. This is because changing God's word is seen as distorting the true message of salvation through faith in Christ and can be seen as a serious threat to the integrity of Christian faith. The apostle Paul states this strongly in Galatians 1:8-9, saying, "But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed". 
  • Galatians 1:8-9: This passage is the most direct answer, stating that anyone—even an apostle or an angel—who preaches a different gospel is to be cursed.
  • Distortion of the Gospel: Preaching a different gospel is considered a distortion of the original message, particularly regarding justification by faith alone, and is seen as a grave matter.
  • Other Warnings: Other biblical passages also warn against altering God's word, such as Revelation 22:18-19, which states that anyone who adds to the prophecy will be subject to plagues, and anyone who takes away from it will have their share in the holy city removed. 
by Main contributor: John Brittian - Teresa Morin, Truth News