Why are so many college students turning against capitalism, Christianity, and freedom?

Isaiah 5:20:

“Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness…”

Why are so many college students turning against capitalism, Christianity, and freedom? Because universities have become breeding grounds for Marxist ideology. Professors push the idea that capitalism is oppressive, Christianity is intolerant, and freedom is just ‘privilege.’ Add peer pressure, and students quickly conform.

This isn’t just theory—it’s rooted in Marxism, the same system that destroyed nations like Venezuela, Russia, and China. And it’s being reinforced by the Democratic Party’s socialist-leaning policies, NGOs, global donors, the media, and even public officials.

Right now, 18.5 million students are in college. That’s over 6 million young Americans being indoctrinated into Marxist thought. And studies show that 36% of Democrats and Republicans alike believe it’s okay to intimidate, silence, or even use violence against those they disagree with.

This is no accident. It’s a coordinated attack on truth, faith, and freedom—and we must expose it.

Watch the Video

Here are other reasons Marxism is spreading, capitalism is under attack, and Christianity is being called evil, with supporting Scriptures:

1. Spiritual Deception in the Last Days

• Marxism fits the “strong delusion” warned about in 2 Thessalonians 2:10–12. It denies God, exalts man, and pushes false justice.

• 2 Thessalonians 2:3 – “Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first…”

---

2. Hatred of Authority

• Marxism rejects God’s order—family, church, and government—and pushes rebellion.

• Psalm 2:2–3 – “The kings of the earth set themselves… against the LORD… saying, Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us.”

---

3. Love of Money / Envy of Wealth

• Capitalism is being demonized because it produces inequality, and envy fuels Marxism.

• James 3:16 – “For where envying and strife is, there is confusion and every evil work.”

• 1 Timothy 6:10 – “For the love of money is the root of all evil…”

---

4. Hatred of Christianity’s Moral Restraint

• Christianity calls for holiness, but Marxism promotes “freedom” from morality.

• John 3:19–20 – “Men loved darkness rather than light… For every one that doeth evil hateth the light…”

---

5. Rise of Globalism (One-World System)

• Marxism strips nations of sovereignty and paves the way for global governance.

• Revelation 13:7 – “And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations.”

---

6. Rebellion Against God’s Design for Family & Gender

• Marxism attacks marriage, gender roles, and children to destroy the family unit.

• Genesis 1:27–28 – “So God created man in his own image… male and female created he them. And God blessed them…”

• 1 Timothy 4:1–3 – “In the latter times some shall depart from the faith… forbidding to marry…”

---

7. Satan as the Architect

• At the root, this is not political—it’s spiritual. Marxism is simply one of Satan’s tools to overthrow God’s truth.

• John 10:10 – “The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy…”

• Ephesians 6:12 – “For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers…”

---

👉 In short: Marxism spreads because the world is deceived, envious, rebellious, and ripe for Satan’s agenda. Capitalism is attacked because it encourages freedom and responsibility. Christianity is hated because it exposes sin and points to Jesus Christ as the only way.

We need to pray—because there really is a Heaven and a Hell. Those who follow hate and reject God’s truth are on a path to eternal separation from Him.

Think about it: if I’m wrong, no one loses anything by choosing love, faith, and forgiveness. But if I’m right, and you choose hate, then you lose everything—forever.

Jesus said in John 14:6: “I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.”

Eternity is not a game. Choose wisely. Choose Christ.

Truth News, Teresa Morin

 Why the Spirit of Hatred Proves Jesus’ Words Are Coming True

🔥 Shocking but true: 29% of Democrats and 7% of Republicans believe it’s okay to kill others just to silence the truth of God. With 18.5 million students in college today, that adds up to nearly 6 million young people consumed by hate—calling evil good and good evil. ✝️ The Bible warns us this would happen in the last days. 💡 But as believers, we’re called to pray, love, and share the truth of Christ—even with those who hate us. 👉 What does God’s Word say about this? 📺 Watch the video now.

https://youtu.be/j6fRhOUTQfE

Truth News by Teresa Morin

The Deep State No Longer a Conspiracy - see the proof and documents

The Deep State No Longer a Conspiracy - Video

The Release of the ODNI Report that Gives Insight into the Network

The episode delves into the concept of "deep state," revealing a network of bureaucrats, intelligence operators, NGOs, and global influencers. 

- The release of the ODNI report and the Durham Annex provides unprecedented insight into this network. 

- The show explores connections between the deep state and past geopolitical events, including the Russia hoax, Ukraine's 2014 revolution, and the Arab Spring. 

- The deep state is described as a real network of power players with little oversight, influencing elections and revolutions. 

- The ODNI report and Durham Annex reveal the inner workings of this network, previously undisclosed. - A self-reinforcing ecosystem is described, involving agencies like the CIA, FBI, NSA, and ODNI feeding intel to NGOs and think tanks. 

- These organizations produce reports that reinforce the desired narrative, which is then amplified by the media. 

- The narrative engineering is exemplified by the manipulation of the 2016 intelligence community assessment on Russian interference. 

- The episode details how Obama's security team reframed Russia as the antagonist, targeting Trump. 

- The process involves multiple layers of operation, from surveillance to media amplification, often based on unverified documents.

See pictures of people involved behind the Russia Conspiracy and other issues

See where the money came from to create this coup against Trump and other dealings around the globe.

Watch the Video by Glenn Beck that puts it all together. 

The Deep State Machine covers: This board illustrates a "self-reinforcing ecosystem" of the deep state. It outlines a three-level system:

• Level 1: Government agencies like the CIA, FBI, NSA, and ODNI, where intelligence is "fed" down to the next level.

• Level 2: NGOs, think tanks, law firms, and defense contractors that "launder" the intelligence into what appear to be independent reports.

• Level 3: The media, which amplifies the narrative using "anonymous sources." The chalkboard also details "levers of operation," including surveillance, election interference, funding, and media coordination.

Deep State Timeline This final chalkboard maps out a timeline of events from 2000 to 2016, showing a pattern of "US-backed interference" [30:30] using a "template" first established in Serbia. The timeline includes:

• 2000: The Serbia "Bulldozer Revolution" [31:02].

• 2003: Georgia's "Rose Revolution" [32:50].

• 2004: Ukraine's "Orange Revolution" [33:14].

• 2011: The "Arab Spring" [34:08].

• 2014: Ukraine's "Maidan" Revolution [35:02].

• 2012-2016: Macedonia [35:40].

• 2016: The host states that "Russia Gate" was the "domestic flip" of this pattern [37:32].

 

 Evidence of the Deep State - document

The Durham Annex findings summary sheds light on the deep state report analysis and how entrenched power structures influence politics. At its core, the investigation revealed a bureaucratic power network spanning intelligence and law enforcement agencies, including the CIA, FBI, NSA, and ODNI.

Declassified Durham Report - Russiagate Scandale by Democrats to create a coup against Donald Trump. 

This hidden intelligence bureaucracy fed selective and often unverified document manipulation into a surveillance-to-media pipeline, ensuring narratives were amplified without thorough verification. The intelligence-media influence chain worked by supplying think tanks and NGOs with intel, which then produced reports. These were echoed by the press, creating a self-reinforcing NGO ecosystem that shaped public perception.

The report shows how this narrative engineering network reframed geopolitical issues, with Russia positioned as the primary antagonist. During the 2016 election cycle, this media manipulation deep state targeted Trump by weaponizing intelligence assessments.

Durham’s work uncovers how the deep state election influence extended beyond U.S. borders, impacting events such as the post-2014 Ukraine revolution and even feeding into the Arab Spring narrative amplification. The findings reveal a global influencers network deep state—a shadow system of power players with little oversight.

In short, the Durham Annex provides unprecedented insights into the think tank dynamics, intelligence narrative amplification, and media manipulation that continue to shape modern politics.

By Teresa Morin
Truth News

#deepstatereportanalysis, #ODNIDurhamfindingssummary, #narrativeengineeringnetwork, #intelligence-mediainfluencechain, #bureaucraticpowernetworkinsights, #surveillancetomediapipeline, #self-reinforcingNGOecosystem, #mediamanipulationdeepstate, #deepstatethinktankdynamics, #hiddenintelligencebureaucracy, #unverifieddocmanipulation, #deepstateelectioninfluence, #post-2014revolutiondeepstate, #intelligencenarrativeamplification, #globalinfluencersnetworkdeepstate,

Iran’s Internal Crisis and Threats Against Israel: Is a Surprise Attack Imminent?

1. Iran’s Domestic Issues:
   Iran is indeed facing significant challenges at home, including water shortages, power outages, economic struggles, and widespread public discontent. These domestic issues are putting pressure on the government.

2. Hostility Toward Israel & Threats:
   Iran's leadership, including figures like Supreme Leader Khamenei, has historically taken a strong, hostile stance against Israel. Statements and signals from Iranian political and military leaders often hint at possible attacks or escalations. The idea of Iran possibly planning a surprise or chemical attack is a concern frequently discussed by analysts and intelligence communities.

3. Source of Iran’s Weapons:
   Iran develops and produces many of its own missiles and bombs domestically, including ballistic missiles and drones. Additionally, it has acquired weaponry through clandestine networks from allies and black markets. Its proxies, like Hezbollah in Lebanon and various militias in Syria and Iraq, also receive Iranian-supplied weapons, which can threaten Israel.

4. The Role of Lobbyists & Messaging:
   Figures like Dr. Trita Parsi work to influence U.S. public opinion and policy on Iran. Signals of possible attacks can sometimes be part of political messaging, but intelligence agencies take such warnings seriously to prepare defenses.

5. Iranian Leadership and Fear of Israel:
   Reports about Supreme Leader Khamenei’s security measures (like staying in bunkers) reflect the regime’s concern about retaliation from Israel, especially considering Israel’s advanced intelligence and military capabilities.

Summary:

Iran is indeed strained domestically, but maintains aggressive rhetoric and military buildup aimed at Israel. The country builds many of its weapons at home and through proxy networks, making it difficult to fully prevent the flow of armaments. The possibility of chemical or surprise attacks is taken seriously by Israel and its allies. Again, Iran, Islam, Shiite is all about murder and killing Israel at all cost even if it meant the citizens starve or cannot get water. Again, Islam is a death cult and not a religion. 

Even With Crime Drop, D.C. Still Outpaces Major Cities — Trump Orders Guard

Isn't it amazing that crime has gone down since Trump became president in DC? But the crime rates are still higher than in any other city. Yes, Trump has the right to fight the high crime. Based on data from July 2024, the population of Washington D.C. was 702,250 residents. Some sources also estimate the 2025 population to be around 717,176.

Many residents of Washington, D.C., have expressed significant concerns about crime in their neighborhoods. Despite official data indicating a decrease in citywide crime rates, local residents report feeling increasingly unsafe.WUSA9+1. 

A recent survey by Safety 7, focusing on Wards 7 and 8, revealed that most of the 150+ residents interviewed do not feel safe. Even if numbers are down, crime is the highest compared to New York City, Chicago, and Los Angeles. See statistics:

Violent crime in 2024 dropped by 35%, with homicides down 32%, robberies down 39%, and armed carjackings down 53%—the lowest violent crime levels in over 30 years.Department of Justice+1

As of mid-2025, violent crime remained down 26%, and overall crime down 8%, compared to 2024.Metropolitan Police DepartmentStatista

A regional dashboard covering DC, Maryland, and Virginia shows a 30% decline in homicides, 32% drop in robberies, 23% fewer rapes, and 21% fewer aggravated assaults in early 2025.MWCOG

However, in 2023, DC recorded 274 homicides, a 20-year high and significantly above years prior—raising the bar before the recent decline.WikipediaWUSA 9In per-capita terms, DC still ranks among the worst in the U.S.:

27.3 violent homicides per 100,000 residents in 2024—the fourth-highest in the countryThe White HouseThe Times

In 2023, DC had the highest violent crime rate among states/cities: 1,151 per 100,000 people, and the highest property crime rate at 4,307 per 100,000.USAFacts

The Fact is, the DC Crime is higher than New York City, Chicago and other big cities. See statistics:

Here’s the comparison picture:

---

📊 Violent Crime (per 100,000 residents, 2024–2025 data)

• D.C. – ~1,150 (highest among U.S. states/major cities in 2023; still in the top tier in 2025)

• Chicago – ~530 - the population is 2,721,308

• New York City – ~370 -  the population is 8,478,072.

• Los Angeles – ~480 - the population is 3,971,883
  
  (Source: USAFacts, FBI UCR, DC MPD)

---

🔪 Homicide Rate

• D.C. – 27.3 per 100k in 2024 → among the top 4 in the U.S.

• Chicago – 20.6

• Philadelphia – 27.5

• New York City – 5.4
  (Note: National average is ~6.3)

---

🚗 Property Crime

• D.C. – ~4,300 per 100k (highest in the nation for 2023; still high in 2025)

• Chicago – ~3,050

• Los Angeles – ~2,780

• New York City – ~1,750

---

📌 Why It’s Still Higher

• Concentration of certain crimes – Carjackings, robberies, and burglaries remain more common than in many other big cities.

• Population size effect – D.C.’s smaller population means a given number of crimes produces a higher per-capita rate.

• Transit & tourism hubs – More non-residents in and out daily can raise property crime exposure.

---

💡 Bottom line:

While D.C. has seen major drops in violent crime since 2024, its per-capita rates are still higher than in New York, LA, or Chicago for many categories. The city is improving, but it hasn’t yet reached the safety levels of most other major metros.

While crime statistics may show a decline in certain areas, the lived experiences of D.C. residents suggest ongoing safety concerns. The debate over how best to address these issues continues, with differing opinions on the balance between local governance and federal intervention.

Traci Morin, Truth News

 U.S. Tariffs Before Trump: How Much Did America Pay and From Which Countries?

The exact amount America “loses” per day due to tariffs can vary widely depending on factors like trade volume, tariff rates, and retaliatory tariffs from other countries. But here are some key points to help understand the impact:

1. Tariffs raise costs — U.S. importers pay more, which often leads to higher prices for American consumers and businesses. This can slow economic growth and reduce purchasing power.

2. Retaliatory tariffs — Other countries often respond by imposing their own tariffs on U.S. exports, hurting American exporters and farmers.

3. Estimates of losses —

   • A 2019 Congressional Research Service report noted that the tariffs imposed during the trade war cost U.S. consumers and businesses about $1.7 billion per month in added costs, which is roughly $56 million per day.

   • The U.S. Chamber of Commerce estimated in 2020 that tariffs and retaliations cost the U.S. economy hundreds of billions of dollars annually.

4. Trade deficit effect — Tariffs aimed to reduce the trade deficit with countries like China, but the deficit often persisted or even grew in some categories.

Summary:
While it’s hard to give a precise daily loss figure due to tariffs, estimates suggest that tariffs during the recent trade conflicts cost Americans tens of millions of dollars per day in higher costs and lost economic output.

1. China

• Tariffs on U.S. goods:
  Initially started around 10% to 25% on about $250 billion worth of American imports.
  China retaliated with tariffs on about $110 billion of U.S. exports, typically between 5% and 25%.

---

2. European Union (EU)

• Tariffs on U.S. goods:
  The EU imposed retaliatory tariffs ranging from 10% to 25% on approximately $7.5 billion worth of U.S. goods, including agricultural products, whiskey, and motorcycles.

---

3. Canada

• Tariffs on U.S. goods:
  Canada retaliated with tariffs of around 10% to 25% on about $12.8 billion worth of U.S. goods, including steel, aluminum, and agricultural products.

---

4. Mexico

• Tariffs on U.S. goods:
  Mexico imposed retaliatory tariffs roughly 5% to 25% on around $3 billion of U.S. imports, including steel, pork, and cheese.

---

5. India

• Tariffs on U.S. goods:
  India imposed increased tariffs on approximately $230 million worth of U.S. goods, with rates reaching 10% to 50% on items like almonds, apples, and walnuts.

---

6. Turkey

• Tariffs on U.S. goods:
  Turkey raised tariffs to 20% to 50% on about $1 billion of U.S. imports, including cars, alcohol, and tobacco.

---

7. Brazil

• Tariffs on U.S. goods:
  Brazil imposed retaliatory tariffs between 10% and 20% on a smaller set of U.S. goods, including steel products.

---

Several reasons explain why previous administrations did not aggressively address tariff imbalances:

1. Globalization Era Mindset:
   

   Since the 1980s and 1990s, the U.S. and many other nations embraced globalization. Leaders believed that integrated supply chains and free markets would maximize efficiency and innovation, despite growing trade deficits.
   Presidents pursued multinational agreements like NAFTA and joined the World Trade Organization (WTO) to establish rules and reduce tariffs globally, favoring negotiated compromises over unilateral action.
   Large multinational corporations, financial sectors, and some political constituencies benefited from open trade and often resisted protectionist measures. Lobbying and campaign contributions created incentives to maintain the status quo.
   Aggressive tariff policies risked retaliation from other countries, possibly sparking trade wars that could harm exporters and global economic stability, deterring many leaders.
   Trade issues are complex, with impacts unfolding over years or decades. Presidents with limited terms often prioritized immediate domestic issues like the economy, healthcare, or national security.
   Some leaders trusted that market forces and economic growth would eventually correct trade imbalances without disruptive interventions.

2. Focus on Multilateral Trade Agreements:
   

3. Political and Economic Pressures:
   

4. Fear of Retaliation and Trade Wars:
   

5. Complexity and Time Lag:
   

6. Belief in Market Self-Correction:

Additional Notes:

• The U.S. also imposed tariffs on steel and aluminum imports from many of these countries, typically 25% on steel and 10% on aluminum.

• Many of these tariffs were part of the trade war aimed mainly at China but affected allies and partners through retaliations.

• Some tariffs remain in place or were adjusted by the Biden administration, but many were negotiated or partially rolled back.

How Biden’s Policies Threaten American Freedom, Privacy, and Way of Life

The Biden Record: Rising Crime, Broken Promises, and the Impact on Black Communities and the American People

Read the facts below:

1) The 2021–2022 inflation surge and its causes

• What happened: Inflation rose sharply in 2021–2022, producing the highest consumer price increases in decades and squeezing households. The pandemic-era supply-chain disruptions and commodity shocks (energy, shipping), strong demand for goods, and large fiscal stimulus (including the American Rescue Plan).

2) Border management and migrant encounters. 

Policy changes (including the end of Title 42 expulsions in 2023) altered how migrants are processed and contributed to operational strains. Critics argue the administration’s policies did not adequately deter illegal crossings; defenders point to legal and operational constraints. U.S. Customs and Border Protection+1. 

Blue States’ Immigration Policies and Impact on Residents

Several blue (Democrat-led) states have welcomed large numbers of immigrants, including undocumented migrants, into their communities. While this reflects a more open immigration stance, it has created significant challenges for local residents:

• Housing and Resources Strain:
  Many blue states provided temporary housing and support services for immigrants. This placed enormous strain on local infrastructure such as shelters, schools, hospitals, and social services.

• Use of Taxpayer Money:
  Tax revenues in these states were allocated to fund immigration support programs, sometimes diverting funds away from existing residents’ needs.

• Residents Felt Neglected:
  Longtime residents in some areas experienced overcrowded schools, longer wait times for medical care, and increased competition for housing and jobs.

• Immigrants Often Received More Immediate Aid:
  Emergency assistance, food programs, and housing support targeted immigrants who were newly arrived, which created perceptions of unfairness and resentment among residents struggling to access similar help.

• Political and Social Tensions:
  This dynamic has fueled debates about immigration policy, state budgets, and priorities—especially in communities already facing economic challenges.

• Officer Morale and Staffing Declined:
  The cuts, combined with increased hostility toward law enforcement, led to lower morale and some officers leaving their jobs, creating staffing shortages.

• Rise in Violent Crime:
  Many of these areas experienced spikes in violent crimes such as shootings, assaults, and robberies, affecting community safety

• Impact on Minority Communities: Unfortunately, Black and other minority neighborhoods often suffered disproportionately from the rise in violent crime, despite being key supporters of reforms.

• Public Demand for Action: As crime rates rose, residents called for restoring police funding and better crime prevention measures.

• Biden Administration and Migrant Flights from Venezuela and Other Countries

  Background:

  • The U.S. immigration system under Biden saw a significant increase in migrants arriving at the southern border, including those from Venezuela, Haiti, Cuba, and other countries experiencing political and economic crises.

  • The administration at times chartered flights and transported migrants from various countries to different U.S. cities as part of processing and resettlement efforts.

  Venezuela and Migrant Flights:

  • Venezuela’s ongoing political and economic turmoil has caused many Venezuelans to flee the country.

  • Some Venezuelan migrants were flown into the U.S. as part of immigration processing.

  • Critics and some border officials have expressed concerns that inadequate vetting could allow individuals with criminal records or gang affiliations to enter.

  Concerns About Criminals Entering:

  • There have been reported cases where individuals with criminal backgrounds or ties to criminal organizations entered the U.S. via the southern border during this period.

  • Immigration officials and border patrol agents have expressed frustration with limited resources and challenges in thorough background checks.

  • Some argue that the administration’s policies and enforcement practices created gaps allowing some criminals to cross undetected.

  Administration’s Response:

  • The Biden administration has stated that they maintain efforts to screen migrants thoroughly.

  • The Department of Homeland Security has ramped up some security and enforcement measures but also aims to balance humanitarian considerations.

  • Public safety remains a stated priority, but critics argue enforcement has been insufficient.

Teacher Shortages and Educational Impact in Chicago’s Black Schools

In Chicago, many experienced teachers have left or been reassigned from predominantly Black neighborhoods, creating challenges for local schools:

• Teacher Pullout & Reassignments:
  Some qualified and veteran teachers were moved or chose to leave Black-majority schools, often due to poor working conditions, lack of resources, and safety concerns.

• Focus on Supporting Immigrant Students:
  Resources and attention have sometimes shifted toward schools with growing immigrant populations, including those receiving more funding or specialized programs for English language learners.

• Impact on Black Students:
  This has contributed to a decline in educational quality in some Black neighborhoods, widening the achievement gap and limiting opportunities for Black students.

• Calls for Equity:
  Community leaders and parents have raised concerns that Black students are being underserved compared to immigrant students, sparking demands for better support, funding, and retention of good teachers.

Record-High Suicides Among Agents

• In 2021, CBP reported 11 agent suicides; in 2022, that number rose to 15, the highest in recent agency history, followed by 2 in 2023 Congress.govWashington Examiner.

• A former senior agent estimated that BP agents now have the highest suicide rate among U.S. law enforcement personnel India Today.

• What Is the World Economic Forum (WEF) Agenda?

  The WEF is an international organization that promotes public-private cooperation on global issues like climate change, economics, and technology. Its "Great Reset" agenda includes:

  • Reshaping Economies: Advocates for sustainable development, green energy transitions, and new economic systems.

  • Urban Planning: Concepts like “15-minute cities,” where daily needs are within short travel, aiming to reduce carbon footprints.

  • Global Governance: Encourages cooperation among governments, corporations, and organizations to address global challenges.

  Critics claim the WEF's agenda threatens national sovereignty, individual freedoms, and economic independence, arguing it promotes top-down control and elitism.

• Why Did Biden Support WEF-Related Policies?

  • Alignment on Climate & Economy: Biden’s policies, such as the Inflation Reduction Act and green energy incentives, align with WEF’s emphasis on climate action.

  • Global Cooperation: Biden supports international collaboration on issues like climate change and pandemic response, key WEF themes.

  • Political & Financial Influences: Some allege close ties between Biden’s administration and corporate partners linked to WEF initiatives.

3) The Afghanistan withdrawal (August 2021) — operational failures and consequences

• What happened: The U.S. withdrawal and the rapid collapse of the Afghan government in August 2021 resulted in a chaotic evacuation from Kabul, the deaths of civilians and U.S. service members, and significant criticism of planning and execution.

• Official reviews / oversight: Congressional and oversight reports, and GAO and DOD after-action materials, documented weaknesses in contingency planning, evacuation readiness, and interagency coordination. House and Senate reports criticized the administration’s planning and execution; the White House later produced its own account. foreign.senate.govHouse Oversight CommitteeThe White House.

• U.S. Withdrawal from Afghanistan: People Left Behind, Equipment Abandoned, and Costs

  People Left Behind:

  • Estimates vary, but thousands of Afghans who assisted U.S. forces or were vulnerable—such as interpreters, their families, and other at-risk groups—were left behind during the chaotic withdrawal in August 2021.

  • The Biden administration and allies evacuated around 124,000 people during the withdrawal, including U.S. citizens and eligible Afghans.

  • However, reports indicate up to several thousand people remain in Afghanistan unable to leave, facing danger under Taliban rule.

4) Classified documents and disclosure controversies

• What happened: Classified documents from Biden’s time as a senator/vice president were discovered in private locations (e.g., a think-tank office, his home) in 2022–2023, prompting searches, reviews, and political controversy. Cover up of his documents.  e Washington Post

5) Military readiness and modernization concerns

• What experts say: The U.S. military faces readiness and modernization pressures that predate any single administration, but GAO and senior military leaders have repeatedly warned the U.S. must accelerate procurement and recapitalization, close readiness gaps, and adapt to emerging threats (e.g., drones, electronics). Critics sometimes argue that policy choices or shifting priorities have not sufficiently restored readiness quickly enough. The GAO’s ongoing readiness work documents long-term challenges. Government Accountability Office+1

• Equipment Left Behind:

  • The U.S. left behind a significant amount of military equipment as the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces collapsed rapidly.

  • Estimates suggest over $80 billion worth of equipment was provided to Afghan forces over two decades; much of it fell into Taliban hands.

  • This included vehicles, aircraft (helicopters, drones), weapons, communication gear, and other military hardware.

  Cost to the U.S.:

  • The total cost of the war in Afghanistan over 20 years is estimated at over $2 trillion, including military operations, reconstruction, and veteran care.

  • The final withdrawal cost includes the loss of equipment and the humanitarian impact of people left behind.

  • The rapid collapse and equipment abandonment have raised serious questions about strategic planning and long-term impact.

6) Ukraine & foreign aid oversight concerns (accountability questions)

• What happened: The U.S. committed large military and economic aid packages to Ukraine after Russia’s 2022 invasion. Oversight and valuation issues have been flagged by GAO and in congressional hearings (for example, asset valuation and tracking of drawdowns). Critics question the scale and oversight of the aid; supporters emphasize strategic necessity. Government Accountability OfficeCongress.gov

War as a Business: How Industrial Giants Profit from Conflict

1. Huge Profits Backed by Taxpayer Dollars

• Over the past two decades, the Pentagon has spent more than $14 trillion on defense. A significant slice—between one-quarter and one-third—was captured by just five major contractors, including Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Boeing, and Northrop Grumman. (turn0search2; turn0search3)

• In 2020 alone, Lockheed Martin received an estimated $75 billion in Pentagon contracts—well beyond the budget for the entire State Department and USAID combined. (turn0search2)

• Following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Lockheed Martin's stock rose 37% and Northrop Grumman’s 40%, boosted by government contracts. (turn0search0)

• In 2025, Lockheed reported $1.71 billion in net income and revenue of nearly $18 billion, driven by sustained demand for systems like the F-35 fighter. (turn0news17)

• A Flashpoint for Ethical Concerns: “War Profiteering”

  • Commentator Bernie Sanders calls the behavior "war profiteering," noting that while weapons multiply in cost, actual deliveries to allies can drop—suggesting profits trump mission needs. (turn0search0)

  • Investigative projects estimate that $31–$60 billion was lost to fraud or waste in Iraq and Afghanistan. Just five major corporations held most of the contracts. (turn0search2)

7) Economic dislocations for certain industries and energy policy effects

• Energy & industry: The administration’s early focus on green energy and permitting changes, plus pandemic shocks and global energy market volatility, coincided with higher energy prices (2021–22) that affected households and energy-intensive industries. Policy tradeoffs here are complex: some actions aim to accelerate clean energy transition and onshoring (e.g., CHIPS, IRA), while critics say the transition and regulations have hurt traditional energy and certain manufacturers. For context on trade and industry ties with China, see CFR backgrounder on U.S.–China trade. The White HouseCouncil on Foreign Relations

How the "Inflation Reduction Act" Was Misleading—and Centered on Green Policy

Critics Say It Was Politically Rebranded Climate Legislation

• Senator John Thune (R-SD) labeled the IRA “deceptively named,” arguing it failed to reduce inflation and instead added to the deficit.
  thune.senate.gov

• A fact-check by AP/PolitiFact found that most independent estimates show the IRA will have very limited impact on inflation—likely too delayed and small in scale to affect the recent surge.
  PolitiFact

• Economists quoted by PBS NewsHour affirm that while inflation did fall—from 9% to 3.2%—the IRA played little to no role. Their consensus credits the Federal Reserve’s interest rate hikes and improving supply chains instead.
  PBSAP News

• The “15-minute city” is an urban planning model that aims to make essential services—like groceries, schools, parks, and healthcare—accessible within a 15-minute walk or bike ride from home. It was popularized by Paris planner Carlos Moreno and implemented in cities like Paris, Portland, and Cleveland. Teen VogueEncyclopedia Britannica.

• The Role of the World Economic Forum (WEF)

  • The WEF, known for its global summits and policy advocacy, has promoted “The Great Reset” agenda, which includes sustainable urban development and smart city planning.

  • The WEF highlights 15-minute cities as a strategy to combat climate change, reduce traffic congestion, and build resilient cities in its reports and discussions.

  • They emphasize integrating technology, green infrastructure, and community-based living in these models.

  • Biden’s Connection and Alignment with the WEF

    • WEF Themes in Biden’s Agenda: Biden’s policy agenda, including the Green New Deal-inspired infrastructure plans, climate commitments, and economic “Great Reset” style recovery approaches, echo many themes promoted by the WEF.

    • Public Statements: Biden’s speeches and policy documents have highlighted goals such as clean energy transition, racial equity, building back better, and global cooperation, which overlap with WEF’s sustainability and economic resilience messaging.

    • WEF Meetings: Biden’s administration officials have participated in or engaged with WEF events. For example, the 2021 WEF Annual Meeting in Davos included U.S. delegation members discussing shared priorities.

    • The World Economic Forum (WEF) is often criticized for pushing a global agenda that many believe aims to control and restrict individual freedoms. Critics argue that the WEF’s vision of “stakeholder capitalism” and initiatives like 15-minute cities are not about sustainability or progress, but about creating a system where a small elite becomes the ultimate bosses — essentially enslaving the masses under their control.

      Backup: Klaus Schwab, WEF founder, openly discusses "The Great Reset," which includes reshaping economies and societies worldwide through centralized control (WEF, 2020). Critics warn this “reset” could concentrate power in the hands of a few corporations and global leaders, undermining democratic institutions (Source: The Great Reset Explained - The Post Millennial).

    • In short, rather than empowering people, critics say the WEF’s agenda is a blueprint for global domination by unelected elites who want to reshape the world to serve their interests — leaving the rest of humanity as controlled subjects.

      Backup: Investigative reports and opinion pieces have raised alarms about WEF's partnerships with multinational corporations and governments that may prioritize profit and control over individual rights (Source: WEF and corporate power - The Guardian; WEF and global governance concerns - The Epoch Times).

8) Trade, China, and supply-chain dependence

• What critics highlight: Longstanding U.S. economic integration with China — dependency in manufacturing and critical supply chains — continued into the Biden years; critics say U.S. policy has not rapidly reversed offshoring trends and that Chinese economic/strategic competition remains a central national-security challenge. The administration passed targeted industrial policy (e.g., CHIPS Act) to onshore some critical manufacturing, but structural dependencies and trade imbalances remain. Council on Foreign RelationsCongressional Budget Office

• Hunter Biden’s Business Ties to China

• BHR Partners: Hunter Biden was a co-founder and board member of BHR Partners, a private equity firm launched in 2013 with Chinese state-backed investors. He reportedly invested around $420,000 in the company and held a 10% stake.

  • Source:

    • The Wall Street Journal — "Hunter Biden Invested in Chinese Firm After His Father Became Vice President" (Oct 14, 2020)
      WSJ Article

    • New York Times — "Hunter Biden and Business Partner Paid in Chinese Equity Deal" (Oct 14, 2020)
      NYT Article

• These articles confirm Hunter Biden’s involvement in business ventures with Chinese entities during Joe Biden’s vice presidency.

9. Where “greed,” enrichment, or “sold to China” assertions run into limits

• What’s documented vs. what’s asserted: There are public debates about whether certain policies disproportionately benefited corporations, specific industries, or actors — and whether U.S. economic strategy failed to protect domestic jobs in some sectors. However, broad claims that the administration “sold out” the U.S. to China or that specific officials personally profited in illegal ways need careful, documented evidence (investigations, indictments, verifiable financial records). Mainstream reporting documents strategic missteps, oversight lapses, and lobbying influence; but allegations of criminality or intentional “sellouts” require substantiation beyond partisan talking points. For a rigorous case, you’d want primary-source documents, audited financial records, or proven legal findings. For trade/China context see CFR timeline and official trade statistics. Council on Foreign Relations.

Biden’s Use of Public-Private Partnerships

• The Biden administration has promoted various PPPs, especially in areas like infrastructure, climate initiatives (including the Inflation Reduction Act), and COVID-19 response efforts.

• For example, programs to promote clean energy, electric vehicles, and infrastructure upgrades often involve government funding combined with private company participation.

10. Biden’s Draining of U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserves: Costs and Consequences

Background:

• Since 2021, the Biden administration authorized several large releases of oil from the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR), aiming to lower gasoline prices and respond to global supply disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine war.

• These releases were some of the largest in SPR history — over 200 million barrels were sold off or loaned out between 2021 and 2023.

Where Did the Oil Go?

• Much of the released oil was sold to oil companies and refineries, intended to increase supply in the market and reduce pump prices.

• Some barrels were loaned or exchanged with allies facing shortages.

• However, critics argue that much of this oil ended up in private hands or was even exported abroad, rather than staying in the U.S. to directly reduce domestic prices.

Cost to the Government:

• The SPR was originally filled at much lower prices — often below $40 per barrel.

• The oil sold during Biden’s releases was sold at market prices that fluctuated widely, sometimes above $80-$100 per barrel.

• The government is effectively selling low-cost oil reserves during periods of higher market prices, which is a financial loss compared to maintaining the reserves.

• Additionally, the government has to buy replacement oil to refill the reserves later, likely at higher prices, increasing the long-term cost.

Economic and Strategic Impact:

• The release temporarily increased supply and arguably helped stabilize prices in the short term.

• However, draining the SPR reduces the nation’s emergency oil stockpile, weakening energy security if future crises arise.

• Critics say the strategy was politically motivated rather than a long-term energy solution.

• The U.S. is more dependent on foreign oil imports and subject to global market volatility due to reduced reserves.

Biden's Statements on MAGA Republicans:

• "Semi-Fascist" Label: In a 2022 fundraiser, President Biden referred to "extreme MAGA Republicans" as a "semi-fascist" movement, expressing concern over their rejection of the 2020 election results and support for political violence. Yahoo+2The Week+2. Attacking and labeling the American Mega groups. 

• "Vermin" Comparison: In 2023, Biden condemned former President Donald Trump for using the term "vermin" to describe political opponents, suggesting it echoed Nazi-era language. ABC News+2The Independent+2

• "Poisoning the Blood" Comment: Biden also criticized Trump's remark about immigrants "poisoning the blood of our country," drawing parallels to Nazi rhetoric. ABC News+1

Criticism and Support:

• Critics' Perspective: Some supporters of the MAGA movement and conservative commentators argue that Biden's language is divisive and unfairly stigmatizes millions of Americans. Baptist News Global

• Supporters' Perspective: Biden's allies contend that his remarks are necessary to highlight what they view as extremist elements within the political landscape and to safeguard democratic institutions.

Policies That Critics Say Hurt American Freedom and Privacy Under Biden

1. Expanded Government Surveillance and Public-Private Partnerships

• Biden’s administration has pushed for greater collaboration between the government and big tech companies to monitor and control “misinformation” online.

• Programs like the “Disinformation Governance Board” and coordination with social media platforms raised alarms about censorship and privacy violations.

• Public-private partnerships blur lines between government authority and corporate power, potentially threatening free speech and individual privacy.

• Critics say this mirrors a surveillance state where private data is shared with government agencies without clear oversight.

• 2. Inflation Reduction Act & Green Energy Policies

  • The Act funds massive green energy projects often partnered with private corporations, expanding government influence in the economy.

  • Critics argue it leads to government mandates on energy use, electric vehicles, and lifestyle changes, limiting consumer choice and freedom.

  • Push for “15-minute cities” and urban planning restricts mobility and private property rights under the guise of sustainability.

  3. Pandemic Response and Public Health Mandates

  • Biden’s aggressive COVID-19 vaccine mandates for businesses and federal contractors sparked debates about bodily autonomy and government overreach.

  • Enforcement through private companies created a public-private enforcement mechanism seen as undermining constitutional freedoms.

  4. Immigration Policies and Border Enforcement

  • Loosened immigration enforcement and massive influxes of undocumented migrants strained public resources and services.

  • Critics claim this was done without sufficient congressional oversight or input from affected communities, eroding trust in government responsiveness.

  5. Increased Federal Spending and National Debt

  • Massive spending bills increased national debt, raising concerns about future tax burdens and economic instability.

  • Some view this as undermining the American capitalist system and fiscal responsibility, impacting personal financial freedoms.

Here are several additional points highlighting actions or policies under Biden that critics argue were negative or posed challenges to the U.S. Constitution and democracy:

1. Expanded Federal Power and Overreach:

   • Increased use of executive orders to bypass Congress on major issues such as immigration, environmental regulations, and COVID mandates. Critics say this undermines the constitutional balance of powers.

2. COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates:

   • Federal mandates for vaccines on businesses and federal employees sparked debate about personal freedoms and bodily autonomy, with lawsuits claiming these mandates exceeded federal authority.

3. Public-Private Partnerships and Censorship:

   • Collaborations between government agencies and big tech companies to regulate and censor online speech have raised constitutional concerns about free speech and government overreach.

4. Border Crisis and Immigration Policy:

   • Alleged failure to enforce immigration laws strictly and the opening of borders have been seen by some as neglecting national sovereignty and security obligations.

5. Manipulation of the Justice System:

   • Allegations of political interference in investigations or prosecutions, which critics argue threaten the independence of the judiciary and rule of law.

6. Election Integrity Concerns:

   • Support for federal voting legislation perceived by some as federal overreach into state-controlled election laws, raising questions about states' rights and election security.

7. Increased National Debt and Spending:

   • Massive government spending without balanced budgets poses a threat to long-term economic stability and burdens future generations.

8. Surveillance Expansion:

   • Expansion of surveillance programs and data collection, sometimes justified by national security, but criticized as invasions of privacy without sufficient oversight.

9. Suppression of Dissent:

   • Labeling political opponents or protesters as extremists or threats has been criticized as chilling free speech and peaceful political dissent.

10. Undermining Law Enforcement:

    • Support for "defund the police" rhetoric in some circles, leading to debates about public safety and respect for law and order.

National Debt Increase Under Biden Compared to Previous Presidents

• Joe Biden (Jan 2021–Present):

  • When Biden took office in January 2021, the national debt was approximately $27.75 trillion.

  • As of mid-2025, the debt is over $33 trillion (approximate figure, varies with monthly Treasury reports).

  • This represents roughly a $5.25 trillion increase in about 4.5 years.

• Barack Obama (Jan 2009–Jan 2017):

  • Debt increased from about $10.6 trillion to $19.95 trillion, about $9.35 trillion over 8 years.

From January 2021 to January 2025, the U.S. national debt increased approximately as follows:

• January 2021: Around $27.75 trillion

• January 2025: About $35.8 trillion (estimated, based on trends through 2024)

Total increase: Approximately $8 trillion over 4 years.

In 2023, the U.S. came dangerously close to defaulting due to delayed debt ceiling agreements, causing volatility in financial markets and widespread concern about the economy.

The federal government, under President Biden's administration, has continued the longstanding practice of borrowing from the Social Security Trust Fund to finance other government expenditures. This is done by issuing special Treasury securities, which are legally required to be repaid with interest.USA Housing Information.

As of December 2024, the Social Security Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) Trust Fund held approximately $2.5 trillion in U.S. Treasury securities, representing about 33% of the total intragovernmental debt. This indicates that a significant portion of the government's borrowing comes from the Social Security Trust Fund. Peterson Foundation.

Conclusion:

The debate over President Biden's rhetoric reflects broader tensions in American politics. While some perceive his comments as a necessary defense of democratic values, others view them as inflammatory and polarizing. This ongoing discourse underscores the challenges of navigating political discourse in a deeply divided society.