Sunday, December 21, 2025

Why does Iran say Israel has no right to exist?

Why does Iran say Israel has no right to exist?

Why does Iran say Israel has no right to exist?


Short Video Part 1

Short Video Part 2

Church Wake Up - Muslims Wake Up and Learn to Love and Accept Jesus

For Iran’s regime, Israel blocks Islamic control of Jerusalem and represents Western influence in the Middle East. Opposing Israel isn’t just politics—it’s ideology,  Since Iran has no religious City like Saudi Arabia.

That’s why Iran funds proxy groups like Hezbollah and Hamas to destroy and kill Every Jew in Israel and worldwide, second Christians. They fight Israel for Iran, without Iran risking direct war. This is a strategy—using proxies to fight a bigger enemy. 

Iran Islam, Shiites, that believes Prophet Muhammad designated his cousin and son-in-law, Ali ibn Abi Talib, as his rightful successor and the first Imam (spiritual leader). Their core difference from Sunni Islam lies in this succession, emphasizing Ali and his descendants (Ahl al-Bayt) as the true sources of religious guidance.  

Israel is in its land and Jerusalem belongs to Israel and not to any Muslim. Remember, Britain gave the land to Israel. Muslims have land all through the middle East. God promised that the Jews would return to Israel. 

If you’re searching spiritually right now, don’t miss the prayer at the end—God loves you and Jesus saves. If you are a muslim, pray this prayer of salvation since Jesus Christ is God and is the only way to salvation. It is a free gift. Allah cannot guarantee your salvation but Jesus can. Prayer of Salvation for Muslims “Father God, I come to You right now with an open heart. I ask You to reveal the truth to me. I believe Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, who died for my sins and rose again. Jesus, I turn away from my sins and I place my trust in You alone to save me. Forgive me, cleanse me, and make me new. I renounce every false refuge, every fear, and every bondage, and I surrender my life to You. Fill me with Your Holy Spirit. Lead me into truth, protect me, and help me follow You every day. In Jesus’ name, amen.” If you prayed that: Say out loud: “Jesus is Lord.” Then begin reading the Gospel of John, and ask God daily: “Jesus, show me who You are.”

Wake Up News

Teresa Morin

Saturday, December 20, 2025

30 different Qurans Until Cairo Decided on One Copy

30 different Qurans Until Cairo Decided on One Copy

DATES FOR THE CANONICAL QIRĀ’ĀT & RIWAYĀT

As you can see from these dates, these people never met Muhammad. 

Nāfiʿ al-Madanī (Qirā’a)

  • Nāfiʿ: d. 169 AH / 785 CE

  • Active in Medina

  • His readings crystallized late 2nd AH, written down 3rd AH

Riwayāt

  • Warsh ʿan Nāfiʿ

    • Warsh (ʿUthmān b. Saʿīd): d. 197 AH / 812 CE

    • Written transmission: early–mid 3rd AH (9th c.)

  • Qālūn ʿan Nāfiʿ

    • Qālūn (ʿĪsā b. Mīnā): d. 220 AH / 835 CE

    • Written transmission: mid 3rd AH

  • Isḥāq ʿan Nāfiʿ

    • Minor/early transmitter, late 2nd–early 3rd AH


Ibn Kathīr al-Makkī (Qirā’a)

  • Ibn Kathīr: d. 120 AH / 737 CE

  • Mecca

  • One of the earliest reciters

Riwayāt

  • Al-Bazzī: d. 250 AH / 864 CE

  • Qunbul: d. 291 AH / 904 CE

  • Written/systematized: 3rd AH


Abū ʿAmr al-Baṣrī (Qirā’a)

  • Abū ʿAmr: d. 154 AH / 770 CE

  • Basra

Riwayāt

  • Ad-Dūrī: d. 246 AH / 860 CE

  • As-Sūsī: d. 261 AH / 875 CE

  • Written transmission: mid–late 3rd AH


Ibn ʿĀmir ad-Dimashqī (Qirā’a)

  • Ibn ʿĀmir: d. 118 AH / 736 CE

  • Syria (Damascus)

Riwayāt

  • Hishām: d. 245 AH / 859 CE

  • Ibn Dhakwān: d. 242 AH / 856 CE

  • Written transmission: 3rd AH


ʿĀṣim ibn Abī an-Najūd (Qirā’a)

  • ʿĀṣim: d. 127 AH / 744 CE

  • Kufa

Riwayāt

  • Ḥafṣ ʿan ʿĀṣim

    • Ḥafṣ: d. 180 AH / 796 CE

    • Became dominant only after Cairo 1924

    • Written form fixed 3rd–4th AH

  • Shuʿbah: d. 193 AH / 809 CE


Ḥamzah az-Zayyāt (Qirā’a)

  • Ḥamzah: d. 156 AH / 772 CE

  • Kufa

Riwayāt

  • Khalaf: d. 229 AH / 844 CE

  • Khallād: d. 220 AH / 835 CE

  • Written transmission: 3rd AH


Al-Kisā’ī (Qirā’a)

  • Al-Kisā’ī: d. 189 AH / 805 CE

  • Grammarian + reciter

Riwayāt

  • Abū al-Ḥārith: d. 240s AH / mid-9th c.

  • Ad-Dūrī (same transmitter as Abū ʿAmr): d. 246 AH / 860 CE


Abū Jaʿfar al-Madanī (Qirā’a)

  • Abū Jaʿfar: d. 130 AH / 747 CE

  • Medina

Riwayāt

  • Ibn Wardan: d. 160s AH / late 8th c.

  • Ibn Jammaz: d. 170 AH / 786 CE

  • Written transmission: early 3rd AH


Yaʿqūb al-Ḥaḍramī (Qirā’a)

  • Yaʿqūb: d. 205 AH / 821 CE

  • Basra

Riwayāt

  • Ruways: d. 238 AH / 852 CE

  • Rawḥ: d. 235 AH / 849 CE


Khalaf al-ʿĀshir (Qirā’a)

  • Khalaf: d. 229 AH / 844 CE

  • Also transmitter for Ḥamzah

Riwayāt

  • Isḥāq: d. 286 AH / 899 CE

  • Idrīs: d. 292 AH / 905 CE


“22–30” ADDITIONAL SUB-TRANSMISSIONS

  • Minor canonical paths recognized by later scholars

  • Systematized mainly by Ibn al-Jazarī

    • d. 833 AH / 1429 CE

  • This is where the rounded number “30” comes from in scholarly discussions


TIMELINE SUMMARY (VERY IMPORTANT)

  • Muhammad dies: 11 AH / 632 CE

  • Main Qirā’a figures: 1st–2nd AH (7th–8th c.)

  • Riwayāt transmitters: 2nd–3rd AH (8th–9th c.)

  • Written standardization: 3rd–4th AH (9th–10th c.)

  • Final canon lists: 10th–15th c. CE

  • Global enforcement of Ḥafṣ: Cairo 1924


ONE-SENTENCE TAKEAWAY

The Qur’anic readings were taught orally in the 7th–8th centuries, but their written forms and canonization were fixed centuries later through human scholarly decisions.

When and why Cairo chose it

  • Year: 1924

  • Institution: Al-Azhar–supervised committee (Egypt)

  • Reason:

    • Schools were using different accepted readings

    • Students were marked “wrong” depending on region

    • Printing required a single, uniform text

➡ Cairo standardized one reading for education and printing.


What happened to the others

  • Other canonical readings (Warsh, Qālūn, Dūrī, etc.):

    • Were removed from public schooling

    • No longer printed for mass use

    • Left to academic study only

They were not declared false—they were set aside to enforce uniformity.


Why this matters

  • Ḥafṣ became dominant because of modern printing and policy, not because it was always the only Qur’an

  • Today, about 90% of Muslims use Ḥafṣ ʿan ʿĀṣim

  • Before 1924, multiple readings were commonly used across the Islamic world


What Existed BEFORE Cairo 1924

1. Multiple Canonical Variants

Islamic scholarship recognized:

  • 10 canonical Qirā’āt (recitations)

  • Each with multiple Riwayāt (transmissions)

  • Totaling about 30 recognized textual forms

These were not identical. Differences include:

  • Different words

  • Singular vs plural

  • Verb tense changes

  • Added or missing phrases

  • Changes that affect meaning

All of these were considered valid Qur’an within Islam.

What Happened to the Other Variants?

They were:

  • Removed from schools

  • Banned from public recitation

  • Excluded from printing

  • Destroyed or archived

Egypt did this because:

  • Children were being marked “wrong” in school

  • Teachers disagreed on correct readings

  • There was confusion across Islamic regions

This is documented by Muslim scholars, not critics.

Important Clarification (This Matters)

Muslims often say:

“There is only one Qur’an.”

But historically, the truth is:

  • There were multiple canonical Qur’anic texts

  • Cairo chose ONE for global uniformity

  • Uniformity ≠ original singularity

Standardization happened because differences existed.

1) DID THE ḤAFṢ QUR’AN HAVE GRAMMAR ISSUES?

Yes — according to early Islamic sources themselves.

Why this happened

  • Early Arabic had no vowel marks

  • No dots to distinguish letters (b / t / th / y / n)

  • Grammar was inferred from oral tradition, not the written text

As Arabic grammar later developed, problems were noticed in the written consonantal text (rasm).One-sentence summary

The Cairo edition of 1924 standardized the Qur’an to the single reading of Ḥafṣ ʿan ʿĀṣim, sidelining other previously accepted variants for the sake of uniformity.


 

Friday, December 19, 2025

Jerusalem isn’t just a city—it’s a symbol of power

Jerusalem isn’t just a city—it’s a symbol of power



Why does Iran focus so heavily on Jerusalem when Islam’s two holiest cities—Mecca and Medina—are in Saudi Arabia?

In this video, we break down the real geopolitical and religious rivalry between Iran and Saudi Arabia, and why Jerusalem became the symbolic battleground. Iran does not control any of Islam’s holy cities, while Saudi Arabia holds Mecca and Medina, giving it religious authority in the Sunni Muslim world. To challenge that dominance, Iran elevates Jerusalem as a global Islamic symbol and rallying point.

This explains:
• Why Iran created “Quds Day”
• Why Jerusalem is central to Iran’s rhetoric
• How this rivalry fuels conflict with Israel
• Why peace efforts repeatedly fail

This is not about ordinary people or civilians — it’s about governments, ideology, and power.

▶️ Watch to understand the real reason Jerusalem stays at the center of Middle East conflict.

I’ve created a FREE 12-page overview book that explores questions many people have never been taught about Jesus, salvation, and Islam—from a historical and biblical perspective. Get your free copy - 📘 Download the free book here: 👉 https://www.touchofgod.org/free-books/exposing-islamThis overview explains: • What Islam teaches about Jesus vs the Bible • How salvation differs between Christianity and Islam • Why these beliefs shape modern Middle East conflict • What is rarely discussed in mainstream conversations https://www.touchofgod.org/free-books/exposing-islam

Sunday, November 30, 2025

Is the Kaaba Pagan? What the Bible Would Say

 Is the Kaaba Pagan? What the Bible Would Say

Is the Kaaba Pagan? What the Bible Would Say


1. The Kaaba’s Origins Were Pagan — Even Islamic Sources Admit It

Before Muhammad, the Kaaba in Mecca was a home of 360 pagan idols worshiped by Arabian tribes.
Islamic historian Ibn Ishaq records that Quraysh tribes bowed to idols such as:

  • Al-Lat

  • Al-Uzza

  • Manat

  • Hubal (the chief idol inside the Kaaba)

These gods were worshiped long before Islam existed.

Muhammad did not deny that the Kaaba was pagan.
He said he “restored” it to the religion of Abraham, but no evidence exists that Abraham ever traveled to Mecca. To say, Muhammad had a visitation from Satan to change the true Word of God and to confuse people. 

2. Scripture’s View: A Pagan Shrine Cannot Become Holy

The Bible shows repeatedly that God rejects pagan shrines, altars, stones, groves, and temples — even if someone later claims to “convert” them to the true God.

What the Bible Says About Pagan Shrines

A. God commands pagan worship sites to be destroyed — not rebranded

Deuteronomy 12:2–3

“You shall utterly destroy all the places where the nations served their gods…
Break down their altars, smash their sacred stones…”

God NEVER said to keep pagan temples and “cleanse them for Yahweh.”
He said to destroy them permanently.

B. Mixing paganism with the worship of God is forbidden

Deuteronomy 12:30–31

“Do not inquire about their gods, saying, ‘How do these nations serve their gods? I will do the same.’”

God forbids:

  • using pagan rituals

  • using pagan locations

  • reusing pagan symbols

  • rebranding pagan worship with His name

C. Even if you say it’s to the “true God,” God still rejects it

Israel once tried exactly what Islam claims to do with the Kaaba:

Exodus 32:5
Aaron built a golden calf and said:

“Tomorrow is a feast to Yahweh!”

But God rejected it completely — because it came from pagan worship.

D. High places remained cursed even after “conversion”

Israel tried to keep pagan high places and worship Yahweh there.

God said:

1 Kings 12:31, 2 Kings 23:8
He condemned the “converted” pagan sites even after the idols were removed.

Why?

Because the foundations were pagan.


3. What Muhammad Did With the Kaaba Fits the Pattern of a Syncretized Pagan Shrine

Muhammad:

  • kept the pagan structure

  • kept the pagan rituals (circumambulation, kissing the Black Stone, etc.)

  • kept pagan pilgrimage months

  • kept pagan holy sites

  • removed the idols but kept all the practices

The Bible teaches that this is syncretism, not purification.

The Black Stone: A Major Issue Biblically

Islam teaches the Black Stone will:

  • have eyes

  • have a tongue

  • testify for Muslims on Judgment Day

This directly violates Scripture, which condemns stones used for worship or supernatural purposes.

Leviticus 26:1

“You shall not set up an image or sacred stone… to bow down before it.”

Muslims:

  • kiss the stone

  • touch it for blessings

  • believe it absorbs sins

  • believe it intercedes

Biblically, this is idolatry.


4. What the Bible Would Say About the Kaaba Today

A. It remains a pagan structure with pagan rituals

Even without idols present, the foundations are pagan, and the rituals originate from pre-Islamic worship of many gods.

B. God never instructed Abraham or any prophet to build or use it

There is zero Scriptural evidence that:

  • Abraham traveled to Arabia

  • Abraham built a shrine in Mecca

  • Abraham performed Hajj rituals

  • Abraham used a Black Stone

  • Abraham circled buildings

  • Abraham kissed stones

Islamic claims contradict Scripture.

C. God rejects worship directed toward pagan geography

God chose:

  • Jerusalem, not Mecca

  • Mount Zion, not the Kaaba

Psalm 132:13–14

“For the LORD has chosen Zion… This is my resting place forever.”


5. In Biblical Terms: The Kaaba Is Idolatry

Based on Scripture:

  • It is a pagan temple repurposed but not redeemed

  • Its rituals are pagan in origin

  • The Black Stone is a forbidden sacred stone

  • Bowing toward it is idolatry

  • Muhammad’s cleansing of idols does NOT change its foundation

The Bible is extremely clear:

You cannot take a pagan shrine and make it holy.

God destroys pagan shrines — He does not allow people to repurpose them.

The Bible warns that anyone who preaches a different gospel than the one already given should be "accursed" or condemned. This is because changing God's word is seen as distorting the true message of salvation through faith in Christ and can be seen as a serious threat to the integrity of Christian faith. The apostle Paul states this strongly in Galatians 1:8-9, saying, "But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed". 
  • Galatians 1:8-9: This passage is the most direct answer, stating that anyone—even an apostle or an angel—who preaches a different gospel is to be cursed.
  • Distortion of the Gospel: Preaching a different gospel is considered a distortion of the original message, particularly regarding justification by faith alone, and is seen as a grave matter.
  • Other Warnings: Other biblical passages also warn against altering God's word, such as Revelation 22:18-19, which states that anyone who adds to the prophecy will be subject to plagues, and anyone who takes away from it will have their share in the holy city removed. 
by Main contributor: John Brittian - Teresa Morin, Truth News

Why Jews and Christians Did NOT Accept Muhammad as a Prophet

 Why Jews and Christians Did NOT Accept Muhammad as a Prophet

Why Jews and Christians Did NOT Accept Muhammad as a Prophet


The rejection of Muhammad by Jews and Christians was NOT personal.
It was doctrinal, prophetic, and biblical.

Both groups had clear criteria for who could be a prophet of God — and Muhammad did not meet any of them.

Let’s break it down systematically.


1. Jews Rejected Muhammad Because He Did Not Meet Biblical Prophetic Requirements

Jews in the 7th century judged Muhammad according to the Hebrew Scriptures (Old Testament), which taught:

A true prophet must never contradict earlier revelation

(Deuteronomy 13:1–5)

But Muhammad’s teachings directly contradicted:

  • Abraham’s covenant

  • The identity of Isaac vs Ishmael

  • The character of God

  • The nature of sin

  • The temple sacrifices

  • The holiness laws

  • The promises to Israel

They immediately recognized inconsistencies with the Torah.

A prophet must speak in the name of Yahweh, the God of Israel

Muhammad spoke in the name of Allah, not YHWH.

This was a major theological red flag.

A prophet must perform signs or miracles

Muhammad performed none during his lifetime (confirmed in the Qur’an itself — Surah 29:50).

But every prophet of the Old Testament who delivered new revelation performed miracles.

A prophet must be from Israel

(Deuteronomy 18:15–18)

Muhammad was not an Israelite — he was an Arab from Mecca.

The Jews therefore concluded:

❌ Not a descendant of Isaac
❌ Not a teacher of Torah
❌ Not consistent with Scripture
❌ Not performing miracles
❌ Not speaking in Yahweh’s name

So the rabbis concluded:
He was not sent by the God of Israel.


2. Christians Rejected Muhammad Because His Teachings Contradicted the Gospel

The early church already had:

  • A completed Bible

  • A defined doctrine of Christ

  • A clear understanding of salvation

Muhammad contradicted every core Christian doctrine.


A. Muhammad denied Jesus is the Son of God

Qur’an 4:171
Qur’an 5:116
Qur’an 19:35

This is the foundational claim of Christianity (John 3:16, Matthew 3:17).

So Christians could not accept a prophet who denied the deity of Christ.


B. Muhammad denied the crucifixion

Qur’an 4:157 says Jesus was not crucified.

But the crucifixion is:

  • historically verified

  • prophetically predicted

  • the center of salvation

Paul said:
“If Christ has not been raised, your faith is in vain.”
(1 Corinthians 15:17)

Rejecting the cross = rejecting salvation itself.


C. Muhammad denied the resurrection of Jesus

Another automatic disqualification.


D. Muhammad taught salvation by works

Islam teaches Heaven is earned by:

  • prayers

  • fasting

  • almsgiving

  • confession

  • good deeds outweighing sins

But Christianity teaches salvation by grace through faith (Ephesians 2:8–9).

The gospel is incompatible with Islamic teaching.


E. Muhammad taught a different God

Allah:

  • has no Son

  • does not love unconditionally

  • does not enter covenant

  • does not dwell with His people

This is a different God from the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Jesus.


3. Both Jews and Christians Rejected Him Because His Revelations Came Through Questionable Experiences

Islamic sources describe Muhammad’s early revelations as:

  • fear

  • shaking

  • sweating

  • convulsions

  • foaming

  • hearing ringing bells

  • suicidal thoughts

  • believing he was demon-possessed

Sahih Bukhari and Ibn Ishaq record that Muhammad thought he was:

“Possessed by a jinn.”

Both Jews and Christians interpreted this as spiritual deception, not divine revelation.

Prophets of God in Scripture NEVER received revelation in terror or confusion.


4. Muhammad’s Message Changed Over Time (Contradictions)

Early Meccan revelations:

  • peaceful

  • affirming Jews and Christians

  • tolerant

Later Medinan revelations:

  • hostile

  • commanding war

  • calling Jews “apes and pigs” (Qur’an 5:60)

  • commanding fighting Christians (Qur’an 9:29)

A true prophet cannot contradict earlier revelation.

This doctrine in Islam is called abrogation — later verses cancel earlier ones.

Jews and Christians saw this as a sign of human invention, not divine revelation.


5. Muhammad’s Lifestyle Did Not Match Biblical Standards

Biblical prophets lived:

  • morally upright

  • sexually pure

  • free of violence

But Muhammad:

  • married a 6-year-old (Aisha)

  • took concubines

  • approved polygamy

  • permitted beating wives (Qur’an 4:34)

  • carried out executions

  • ordered attacks on caravans

  • enslaved women

  • took war booty

This did not match the life of biblical prophets or Jesus.


SUMMARY

Why Jews Rejected Muhammad

  • Contradicted Torah

  • Not an Israelite

  • No miracles

  • Not speaking for Yahweh

  • Taught against God’s covenant

  • Revelation experiences resembled demonic influence

Why Christians Rejected Muhammad

  • Denied Jesus is the Son of God

  • Denied the crucifixion

  • Denied the resurrection

  • Taught salvation by works

  • Contradicted the gospel

  • Presented a different God

Why both rejected him

  • His revelations were inconsistent and contradictory

  • His life did not match prophetic holiness

  • His message conflicted with Scripture

  • His spiritual experiences looked dangerous

This is why neither Jews nor Christians accepted him — not because of jealousy, but because he did not meet God’s prophetic standard.

By main contributor - John Brittian - Teresa Morin, Truth News

Did Islam Hate Jews in the 6th and 7th Century?

Did Islam Hate Jews in the 6th and 7th Century? A Historical and Scriptural Analysis

Did Islam Hate Jews in the 6th and 7th Century? A Historical and Scriptural Analysis


For years many have asked whether Islam originally hated Jews or whether the hostility developed later. The answer is not simple, but it is historically traceable. Islam did not begin with hatred toward Jews. Instead, tensions grew progressively from religious rejection, political conflict, and military events in Muhammad’s lifetime. These conflicts later shaped Islamic scripture, law, and attitudes for centuries.

To understand this clearly, we must walk through the history of Islam in the 6th and 7th centuries, examine early Islamic scripture, and study the documented conflicts between Muhammad and Jewish tribes in Arabia.

This article provides a factual, thoroughly sourced, and chronological explanation of how Islamic attitudes toward Jews formed.

Eventually, the Quran changed and changed its belief out of jealousy and rejection from the Christians and Jews. 


1. Did Islam Exist in the 6th Century?

Islam did not exist in the 6th century.

Muhammad was born in 570 AD, and Islamic revelation began in 610 AD. Therefore:

  • In the 500s (6th century): No Islam, no Qur’an, no Islamic doctrine.

  • In the early 600s (7th century): Muhammad begins preaching.

  • Around 622–632 AD: Islam forms its government, laws, and identity in Medina.

So the real question is:

Did Islam develop hatred toward Jews during the 7th century?

The historical answer is yes, but not at the beginning.


2. Early Islam’s Initial Relationship with Jews (610–622 AD)

Muhammad’s hope for Jewish acceptance

When Muhammad first began preaching monotheism in Mecca, he believed Jews would support him because:

  • They too worshiped one God.

  • They traced their lineage to Abraham.

  • They already had a prophetic tradition.

Muhammad initially positioned himself as a reformer restoring the faith of Abraham, assuming Jews would recognize him.

He even:

  • Prayed toward Jerusalem (before the Qibla changed to Mecca)

  • Adopted a fast similar to Yom Kippur

  • Used Old Testament stories to validate his message

He expected affirmation from Jewish rabbis, believing his revelations aligned with the Hebrew Scriptures.

But Jewish leaders rejected him

Jewish scholars in Arabia examined his teachings and declared openly:

  • Muhammad did not meet the requirements of a biblical prophet

  • His revelations contradicted the Torah

  • His teachings contained errors in biblical stories

They concluded he was not a prophet sent by the God of Israel.

This rejection deeply angered Muhammad and became a turning point.


3. In Medina (622–632 AD): Conflict Explodes Between Muhammad and Jews

When Muhammad fled Mecca and migrated to Medina in 622 AD, he entered a city containing three powerful Jewish tribes:

  • Banu Qaynuqa

  • Banu Nadir

  • Banu Qurayza

Each of these tribes eventually came into conflict with Muhammad. Historical Islamic sources document these events, including:

  • Sahih Bukhari

  • Sahih Muslim

  • Ibn Ishaq’s “Life of Muhammad”

  • Al-Tabari’s History

These conflicts fundamentally shaped Islamic attitudes toward Jews.

Let’s walk through them.


A. The Banu Qaynuqa (624 AD) — Expelled

Muhammad accused the Banu Qaynuqa of breaking an agreement after a conflict with a Muslim woman in the marketplace.

As a result:

  • Muhammad surrounded their fortress

  • Forced their surrender

  • Expelled the entire tribe from Medina

This was the first major break between Muhammad and Jewish tribes.


B. The Banu Nadir (625 AD) — Expelled and Land Seized

Muhammad next accused the Banu Nadir of plotting to assassinate him.

Whether the plot occurred or was a political justification is debated by historians.

Muhammad ordered:

  • Their expulsion

  • Confiscation of their land

  • Division of their property among Muslims

This increased animosity profoundly.


C. The Banu Qurayza (627 AD) — Mass Execution

This is the most severe and influential incident.

Background:

During the Battle of the Trench, Muhammad accused the Banu Qurayza of conspiring with Meccan armies.

After the battle:

Muhammad besieged their fortress, leading to their surrender.

Punishment:

Islamic historical records agree:

  • 600–900 Jewish men were executed

  • Women and children were enslaved

  • Property was divided among Muslims

  • Young women were taken as concubines

These events are recorded in:

  • Sahih Bukhari

  • Sunni Hadith collections

  • Ibn Ishaq’s Sira

  • Al-Tabari

This massacre radically shifted the tone of Islamic scripture concerning Jews.

From this period forward, hostile Qur’anic verses appear.


4. Quranic Verses Against Jews — Written During These Conflicts

Hostility toward Jews in the Qur’an does not appear in the earliest Meccan revelations, but it becomes pronounced in the Medinan period.

Here are notable examples directly tied to conflict:

“Jews are apes and pigs.” — Qur’an 5:60

“The Jews are the most hostile to the believers.” — Qur’an 5:82

“Do not take Jews or Christians as friends.” — Qur’an 5:51

“Fight the Jews and Christians until they pay the jizya with humiliation.” — Qur’an 9:29

These verses were:

  • Written after Jews rejected Muhammad

  • Reinforced political subjugation

  • Reflected military conflict

This is the root of Islamic hostility toward Jews in the 7th century.


5. Did Early Islam Teach Hatred Toward Jews?

A balanced historical perspective requires three major conclusions:


1. Islam did not begin with hatred toward Jews.

Muhammad initially hoped Jews would affirm him.


2. Jewish rejection of Muhammad caused escalating hostility.

This rejection led to:

  • confrontations

  • expulsions

  • executions

  • changes in scripture


3. By the mid 7th century, hostility became embedded in Islamic law and scripture.

The consequences were long-lasting:

  • Dhimmi status (non-Muslims considered inferior)

  • Jizya tax required from Jews and Christians

  • Restrictions on worship, dress, and property

  • Jews viewed as subordinate under Islamic rule

This created a 1,400-year pattern of tension between Muslims and Jews.


6. Not Racial Hatred — Religious and Political

Islam did not develop hatred toward Jews because of their ethnicity.

Rather, conflict emerged because:

  • Jews rejected Muhammad as a prophet

  • Jewish tribes resisted his political rise

  • Muhammad punished and subdued opposing tribes

This is why hostility is religious, not ethnic.

Islam teaches:

  • Jews are “People of the Book”

  • Jews must not be annihilated

  • But Jews must live under Islamic authority

  • Jews cannot be equals to Muslims

This laid the foundation for centuries of Islamic antisemitism.


7. The Result: A 1,400-Year Pattern of Conflict

From Muhammad’s lifetime onward, Jews often lived under:

  • oppressive taxation

  • forced conversions

  • massacres in certain regions

  • periodic persecution

  • legalized inferiority

While not constant across all Islamic empires, the pattern originated in the 7th century events between Muhammad and the Jewish tribes.


8. Summary of the Historical Evidence

6th century:

Islam did not exist. No hatred.

Early 7th century (610–622):

Muhammad hoped Jews would accept him.

Mid 7th century (622–632):

Jewish rejection → conflict → military action → executions.

Later 7th century:

Hostile Qur’anic verses appear; formalized Islamic law places Jews under dhimmi status.

Is Islam Jealous of the Blessings of the Jews and Their Connection to Abraham?

Short Answer:

Yes — historically and theologically, Islamic tradition shows apparent tension and rivalry with the Jewish claim to Abraham, the covenant, the land, and the promises.
Not “jealousy” in the emotional sense, but a religious competition for legitimacy that has existed since the 7th century.

The Core Issue: Abrahamic Legitimacy

Judaism teaches:

  • The covenant is through Isaac, the son of promise (Genesis 17:19–21).

Islam teaches:

  • The covenant is through Ishmael, not Isaac (even though the Qur’an never names which son Abraham nearly sacrificed).

This creates a direct conflict of identity:

JudaismIslam
Isaac is the chosen sonIshmael is the chosen son
Jews inherit the land promised to AbrahamMuslims claim they are the true heirs of Abraham
Covenant of circumcision given to Abraham & IsaacIslam claims Abraham was a Muslim and so are his descendants

Islam’s Theological Reversal of Jewish Blessings

To validate itself, Islam rewrites key biblical truths:

Jerusalem

Judaism: God chose Jerusalem for His name (1 Kings 11:36).
Islam: Claims the Temple Mount through the “Night Journey” (7th century addition).

Abraham

Judaism: Abraham was the father of the Hebrew people.
Islam: Abraham was the first Muslim (Qur’an 3:67).

The Covenant

Judaism: Covenant through Isaac.
Islam: Claims Ishmael’s lineage.

The Temple

Judaism: Central place of worship.
Islam: Builds the Dome of the Rock on top of the Temple site in 691 AD to assert supremacy.

This is not coincidence—it is religious rivalry.

Abrogation (Naskh) — Earlier Friendly Verses Replaced by Later Hostile Ones

Islamic scholars teach “abrogation” (naskh), meaning later verses cancel earlier ones.

Most peaceful and friendly Meccan verses were nullified by later Medinan commands to fight.

For example:

  • “No compulsion in religion” (2:256)
    was abrogated by

  • “Fight those who do not believe” (9:29)

Surah 9 is one of the last chapters revealed — and it is the most hostile toward Jews and Christians.

New revelations began attacking Jews and Christians:

Hostile Medinan passages:

  • “The Jews are the most hostile to the believers.” (Qur’an 5:82)

  • “Fight those who do not believe… among the People of the Book.” (Qur’an 9:29)

  • “May Allah destroy them; how deluded they are.” (Qur’an 9:30)

  • “The Jews say Ezra is the son of Allah.” (Qur’an 9:30)

Conclusion:

Islam’s hostility toward Jews is historically traceable, originating from:

  • Jewish rejection of Muhammad

  • Political and tribal confrontation

  • Warfare in Medina

  • Scripture written in the context of conflict

This shaped Islamic attitudes for more than a millennium.

By Teresa Morin, Truth News