From Fairness Doctrine to Modern Bias: How Media Shapes Public Opinion

Fairness Doctrine Explained: FCC Rules from 1949 to 1987

The Fairness Doctrine was a policy implemented by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in 1949 to ensure that broadcasters presented controversial issues of public importance in a manner that fairly reflected differing viewpoints. This policy arose from concerns about the limited availability of broadcast frequencies and the potential for broadcasters to misuse their licenses to promote biased agendas. Reagan Library

Key Facts About the Fairness Doctrine

• Origins and Implementation: The FCC's Editorializing Report in 1949 marked the beginning of the Fairness Doctrine, which required broadcasters to devote time to discussing controversial matters of public interest and to air contrasting views regarding those matters. Wikipedia

• Legal Support: In 1969, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Fairness Doctrine in the case of Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC. The Court ruled that broadcasters, as licensees of public airwaves, had an obligation to serve the public interest, which included providing balanced coverage of controversial issues. Reagan Library

• Repeal of the Doctrine: In 1987, the FCC abolished the Fairness Doctrine, concluding that it was no longer necessary due to the increased number of broadcast outlets and the rise of cable television, which provided a broader range of viewpoints. Wikipedia - meaning the news media and now social media is used for weaponizing the agenda. 

• Subsequent Developments: In 2011, the FCC officially removed the rule implementing the Fairness Doctrine from the Federal Register, reflecting its commitment to eliminating outdated regulations. The Regulatory Review

The repeal of the Fairness Doctrine has been a subject of debate, with some arguing that it has led to a more polarized media landscape, while others contend that it has allowed for greater freedom of expression in broadcasting. Financial Times

1. Agenda Setting in Weaponizing the News Media and Social Media

• Media doesn’t just report news; it decides which stories get attention.

• By emphasizing certain issues and ignoring others, the media can make some topics seem urgent and others irrelevant.

• Example: Highlighting only certain crimes, protests, or political scandals can influence what people think is important.

---

2. Framing the Narrative

• The way a story is presented—choice of words, images, and context—can push viewers toward a particular interpretation.

• Example: Labeling a protest “violent riots” vs. “peaceful demonstrations” changes perception.

---

3. Repetition and Reinforcement

• Repeating the same talking points across multiple outlets creates familiarity and can normalize a particular viewpoint.

• Over time, audiences may unconsciously accept repeated narratives as fact.

---

4. Omitting Alternative Perspectives

• By limiting or discrediting opposing viewpoints, media can create the illusion that there’s only one “correct” side.

• Historically, the Fairness Doctrine (1949–1987) required broadcasters to include opposing perspectives; after its repeal, there’s less obligation to balance controversial issues.

---

5. Emotional Manipulation

• Stories often appeal to fear, anger, or outrage, which strengthens the audience’s emotional attachment to the media’s agenda.

• Emotional responses are faster than logical analysis, making people more susceptible to influence.

---

6. Sowing Division or Compliance

• Media can exaggerate differences or conflicts to polarize groups, making people more reactive and easier to influence.

• Alternatively, media can promote specific “acceptable” behaviors, beliefs, or policies, conditioning compliance.

---

7. Control Through Ownership and Funding

• Large media corporations or government influence can steer coverage toward particular political or corporate interests.

• Advertisers or sponsors can indirectly influence what content gets produced or prioritized.

---

Bottom line: Weaponizing the media isn’t just about lying—it’s about selective presentation, repetition, emotional manipulation, and limiting alternatives to guide public thought and behavior toward a desired agenda. It is a form of brainwashing and bending people to wrong truth. How is that done? 

News Media used as a form of Brainwashing

From a psychological and sociological perspective, repeating the same messages over and over in the media can function as a form of brainwashing or thought influence, especially when alternative viewpoints are suppressed. Here’s why:

1. Repetition Creates Familiarity – Humans are wired to accept ideas that are repeated frequently. Even if something is false or biased, constant repetition can make it seem “true” or normal. This is sometimes called the illusory truth effect.

2. Narrative Control – When media outlets present only one perspective, especially on political or social issues, it narrows the audience’s perception of reality. People begin to internalize that version as the only valid one.

3. Emotional Reinforcement – Repeated messaging often pairs facts (or claims) with emotional cues — fear, outrage, or hope. Emotionally charged repetition strengthens memory and belief.

4. Social Proof & Herd Mentality – If everyone is “hearing the same thing,” it creates a sense of consensus, pressuring individuals to conform, even if they privately doubt the narrative.

5. Suppression of Alternatives – Brainwashing isn’t just repetition; it’s also removing or discrediting opposing viewpoints. The Fairness Doctrine was originally intended to prevent exactly this by ensuring multiple perspectives were aired. Its repeal meant less accountability for “one-sided messaging.”

Bottom line: Yes, media repetition with a single viewpoint can manipulate thought patterns — essentially conditioning the audience to accept a particular perspective. It’s not always overt “brainwashing” in the classic sense, but it can function the same way psychologically.

Teresa Morin, Wakeup News

If you like my articles, visit my website at touchofgod.org - Touch of God Int'l Ministries of Healing and Deliverance

Create Videos

3-Minute Video Script

[Opening – 0:00-0:20]
On-screen: montage of news clips, headlines flashing
Narrator: “Have you ever wondered why the same story keeps appearing across every news outlet? Or why public opinion seems to shift after weeks of repeated messaging? Today, we’re breaking down how the news media can weaponize an agenda and shape the way you think.”

[Section 1 – 0:20-1:10]
On-screen: images of media outlets, anchors speaking
Narrator: “Media doesn’t just report facts. Through agenda-setting, it decides which stories matter and which get ignored. By repeating certain topics over and over, the media can normalize a specific viewpoint—this is called the ‘illusory truth effect.’ Pair this with framing, where words and images are carefully chosen to influence perception, and you see how powerful this tool can be.”

[Section 2 – 1:10-2:00]
On-screen: split screen showing emotional headlines vs. reality
Narrator: “Weaponization goes beyond repetition. By omitting alternative perspectives or discrediting opposing viewpoints, media creates the illusion that only one side is ‘right.’ Add emotional manipulation—fear, outrage, or anger—and audiences are more likely to accept the narrative without critical thinking.”

[Section 3 – 2:00-2:40]
On-screen: historical photos, Fairness Doctrine text
Narrator: “Historically, the Fairness Doctrine (1949–1987) required broadcasters to present opposing views on controversial issues. Its repeal allowed single-narrative messaging to spread more freely, making it easier to influence public opinion through repetition and selective coverage.”

[Closing – 2:40-3:00]
On-screen: call to action
Narrator: “Understanding how media can weaponize agendas helps you think critically and seek truth. Subscribe for more insights on media literacy, and don’t forget to hit the bell to stay informed!”

---

45–55 Second Video Script (Short)

[Opening – 0:00-0:10]
Quick news montage
Narrator: “Ever notice how the same story keeps repeating on every channel? That’s not an accident—it’s media influence at work.”

[Middle – 0:10-0:35]
Narrator: “Through repetition, framing, and selective coverage, the news can push a single viewpoint while leaving out alternatives. Emotional headlines make it stick, shaping how we think and feel.”

[Closing – 0:35-0:55]
Narrator: “Stay alert, question what you see, and look for multiple perspectives. Hit subscribe for more insights on media manipulation and critical thinking.”

---

5-Minute Extended Video Script

• Includes all points from the 3-minute script

• Adds real-world examples: social media echo chambers, political campaigns, and historical propaganda

• Goes deeper into psychology: confirmation bias, herd mentality, emotional reinforcement

• Concludes with practical tips: fact-checking, multiple sources, recognizing framing

(I can write the full 5-minute script in detail next if you want—it will be about 750–800 words.)

---

YouTube Meta Description

“Discover how the news media can weaponize agendas through repetition, framing, emotional influence, and selective coverage. Learn to think critically and see through bias in reporting. Subscribe for media literacy insights.”

---

SEO Keywords

news media manipulation, media weaponization, media agenda control, repetition in news, media bias explained, framing in media, media brainwashing, influence public opinion, Fairness Doctrine, critical media literacy

Social Media Post (Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn)

Post Text:
“Did you know the news media can shape what you think without you even realizing it? Through repetition, framing, and selective coverage, a single narrative can dominate public perception. 📰💭

Learn how to spot media bias and protect your mind from manipulation. Watch our latest video now! 🔗 [Insert YouTube Link]

#MediaManipulation #CriticalThinking #NewsBias #Brainwashing #MediaLiteracy #StayInformed #FairnessDoctrine #AgendaSetting #QuestionEverything #ThinkForYourself”

Visual Suggestion: Use the same thumbnail/image you created for YouTube for consistency.

---

X / Twitter Post

Post Text Option 1:
“The news media isn’t just reporting facts—it can weaponize narratives through repetition, framing, and emotional bias. Are you thinking for yourself or being influenced? 📰🤔 Read now: http://bit.ly/48s5zBm #MediaManipulation #NewsBias #CriticalThinking”

Post Text Option 2:
“From the Fairness Doctrine to today, the media shapes opinions by repeating the same messages & leaving out opposing views. Don’t be a passive consumer. Watch here: [YouTube Link] #MediaLiteracy #Brainwashing #AgendaSetting”

Post Text Option 3 (Short/Attention-Grabbing):
“Is the news brainwashing you? Repetition + framing + emotion = media weaponization. Learn the truth: http://bit.ly/48s5zBm #MediaManipulation #CriticalThinking #NewsBias”

Who’s Really Behind Antifa? Unmasking the Networks Funding Chaos

 Who’s Really Behind and Funding Antifa? Unmasking the Networks Funding Chaos

Watch Short Video

At a recent White House roundtable hosted by President Donald Trump, the discussion turned to one of the nation’s most controversial movements—Antifa—and the growing investigation into who is funding their activities. The administration’s directive: follow the money.

Definition of Antifa - Antifa is a militarist, anarchist enterprise that explicitly calls for the overthrow of the United States Government, law enforcement authorities, and our system of law. It uses illegal means to organize and execute a campaign of violence and terrorism nationwide to accomplish these goals.

During the meeting, several journalists shared firsthand accounts of being physically attacked or harassed by Antifa activists while covering protests. Yet the most eye-opening revelations came from Seamus Bruner, Director of Research at the Government Accountability Institute, who briefed the President and his Cabinet on what he described as a “dark-money network of NGOs and activist fronts” fueling unrest across America. Bruner outlined how this “permanent protest-industrial complex” operates—funding and organizing disruptive movements nationwide under the banner of social justice while concealing its financial roots.

According to the briefing, Antifa functions both domestically and internationally as a radical, far-left movement whose goal is to undermine democracy, free speech, and capitalism—the very pillars of American liberty.

In response, the White House under President Trump officially designated Antifa as a domestic terrorist organization and ordered federal agencies to investigate, disrupt, and dismantle any illegal financial networks tied to it. The executive order stated that Antifa “conceals its funding sources and operations,” and directed law enforcement to utilize “all applicable authorities” to expose individuals and entities providing material support to the group.

Included is the following:

Foreign donors like Swiss billionaire Hansjörg Wyss - they're pouring money into this entire ecosystem."

One donor to TIDES CENTER is The Barack Obama Foundation. $1 million 2022 and 2023. per 990.

More than $100 million in US taxpayer funding has flowed into these funding networks”

These organizations and people, are funding the destruction of America. Right now, the Democratic party has no values or morals. At this time, the Republican have the morals and values to keep in place that this country was founded on. 

This may become treason against the United States and its citizens since many are being affected by them. Antifa organization has their own lawyers to keep them out of jail when they do commit a crime.

Some of these include:

• Property damage / vandalism
  In many protests where antifa-affiliated individuals participated, property damage (breaking windows, graffiti, etc.) has been reported. Wikipedia+3ISD+3The Guardian+3

• Clashes with law enforcement
  In protests and counterprotests, some individuals have assaulted or attempted to resist arrest by police. Use of projectiles, sticks, shields, pepper spray are examples. Wikipedia+2ISD+2

• Firebombing / incendiary devices
  One noted incident: in Tacoma, Washington (2019), Willem van Spronsen, who called himself “Antifa,” attempted to firebomb a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention center, using incendiary devices and setting properties on fire. He was shot and killed by law enforcement. Wikipedia+2ISD+2

• Homicide / attempts
  There has been at least one case where a person identifying with antifa allegedly shot and killed another person during a protest clash: the killing of Aaron Danielson by Michael Reinoehl in Portland, Oregon (2020). ISD+2The Guardian+2
  Also, in the Tacoma incident above, while van Spronsen died, no one else was reported killed. Wikipedia+2ISD+2

• Assaults, threats, harassment
  Journalists, counter-protesters, or opposing groups have in some instances been physically assaulted, harassed, or threatened. There are reported attacks or confrontations in some protests. Wikipedia+2Discover The Networks+2

• Obstruction of law enforcement / blocking roads / interfering with operations
  Some protesters have blocked law enforcement or infrastructure, resisted arrest, or tried to prevent law enforcement activities. ISD+1

Musk: "Way More Than $100 Million" in U.S. Taxpayer Funds Funneled Into NGOs Fueling Antifa. It will be interesting in the coming days who all are trying to destroy the democracy to start the great reset. Trump is doing everything in his power to save the democracy of America. 

What is the agenda and why is this happening?

There is a growing movement led by powerful global organizations—such as the World Economic Forum, major central banks, and political elites—working toward what they call a “Great Reset.” Their stated goal is to reshape the world’s economy, environment, and society under the banner of sustainability and equity. Yet many Bible-believing Christians discern a deeper, prophetic agenda behind this global shift.

According to Scripture, these efforts reflect the foundation of a coming one-world government, economy, and digital control system that will ultimately prepare the way for the Antichrist (Revelation 13). Through digital identification systems, cashless economies, and surveillance-driven “smart cities” or “15-minute cities,” individuals could soon be monitored and restricted based on compliance with global standards.

What is being presented as convenience and safety may in fact become a mechanism of control—limiting personal freedoms, freedom of speech, movement, and even the right to buy or sell without allegiance to a centralized system. These developments echo Revelation’s warning of a time when “no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark” (Revelation 13:17).

Believers must stay spiritually alert and grounded in the Word of God, recognizing that these global agendas align with the prophetic timetable leading to the rise of the Antichrist. Now is the time for prayer, discernment, and courage to stand firm in faith and truth amid a world moving toward deception and control.

🌍 Countries with Established Digital ID Systems

• Estonia: Pioneered digital identity with its e-ID system, enabling citizens to access a wide range of public services online. Regula

• India: Aadhaar is the world's largest biometric digital ID system, covering over 99% of the population and facilitating access to various services. Financial Times

• Singapore: Singpass serves as a comprehensive digital ID, allowing residents to access numerous government and private sector services. Identity

• Denmark: MitID is the national digital ID system, replacing the older NemID, and is used for secure online authentication. Regula

• United Arab Emirates (UAE): UAE Pass is a national digital ID that provides secure access to government services. Regula

• Spain: MiDNI is the digital ID system based on the national identity card, allowing for secure online identification. Regula

• South Korea: The country has implemented a Mobile IDentification App for secure digital identification. Regula

• Canada: Several provinces have introduced digital ID systems, with ongoing discussions about a national framework. Identity

---

🌐 Countries in the Process of Implementing Digital ID Systems

• United Kingdom: The government is developing the GOV.UK Wallet, a digital ID mobile app, with plans for broader adoption by 2027. The Verge

• European Union: Under the eIDAS 2.0 regulation, all EU member states are required to provide citizens with a digital identity wallet by 2026. euronews

• United States: Several states, including California, Arizona, and Georgia, have introduced digital driver's licenses through platforms like Apple Wallet and Google Wallet. Android Central

• Australia: The government is working on expanding digital identity services to streamline access to public services. Identity

• Brazil: The government has launched initiatives to digitize national identity cards and expand digital service access. Identity

• Japan: My Number Card serves as the digital ID system, with ongoing efforts to enhance its usage for public services. Identity

• South Africa: The country is developing a digital ID system to improve service delivery and reduce fraud. Brookings

---

🌍 Countries with Pilot or Planning Stages

• Ethiopia: The National ID Program aims to provide all citizens with a unique identification number, using biometric technology. Wikipedia

• Jordan: The Sanad app offers digital identity services, allowing citizens to access various government services online. Wikipedia

• Nigeria: The National Identity Management Commission is working on expanding the National Identification Number (NIN) system. Brookings

• Pakistan: The National Database and Registration Authority (NADRA) is enhancing its digital ID infrastructure. Brookings

• Brazil: The government is launching initiatives to digitize national identity cards and expand digital service access. Identity

The Hidden Purpose of Digital IDs: Control Over Freedom

While governments and organizations present digital ID systems as tools for convenience, efficiency, and security, many critics warn of a deeper agenda: centralized control over citizens.

A digital ID can link all personal information—financial, medical, travel, and online activity—to a single identity. In theory, this could allow authorities to monitor behavior, restrict access to services, or track movement. For example:

• Smart city initiatives (like “15-minute cities”) could limit where citizens are allowed to travel unless they comply with certain rules.

• Digital currencies and cashless systems can restrict the ability to buy or sell, depending on compliance with government or corporate mandates.

• A single, centralized ID could make it easier to censor or punish speech, effectively limiting freedom of expression online and offline.

Biblically, this aligns with warnings about a one-world system and control over buying, selling, and movement in Revelation 13:16–17. Believers are called to discern deception, remain alert, and pray for protection while navigating these changes in society.

By Teresa Morin, Truth News.

If you like my articles, visit my website at touchofgod.org - Touch of God Int'l Ministries of Healing and Deliverance

#DigitalID #15MinuteCities #LossOfFreedom #GovernmentSurveillance #GlobalReset #OneWorldGovernment #AntichristWarning #EndTimesProphecy #CashlessSociety #LimitFreedomOfSpeech #SmartCities #DigitalIdentification #BiblicalWarning #GlobalistAgenda #CivilLiberties #PrivacyConcerns #StayAlert #FreedomUnderThreat #PropheticInsight #ChristianDiscernment

Videos to make

🎥 3-Minute Video Script: "Unmasking Antifa: Who's Funding the Chaos?"

[Opening Scene]

Visuals: Footage of Antifa protests, clashes with law enforcement, and headlines about Antifa.

Narrator (Voiceover):
"Antifa—a name that evokes strong reactions across the political spectrum. But who are they really, and more importantly, who's funding their activities?"

---

[Scene 2: White House Roundtable]

Visuals: Footage of a White House roundtable discussion.

Narrator (Voiceover):
"Recently, President Donald Trump hosted a White House roundtable to address the growing concerns over Antifa. Journalists shared firsthand accounts of being attacked by Antifa activists during protests."

---

[Scene 3: Seamus Bruner's Briefing]

Visuals: Seamus Bruner speaking at the roundtable.

Narrator (Voiceover):
"Seamus Bruner, Director of Research at the Government Accountability Institute, revealed a complex network of dark-money NGOs and activist groups fueling unrest nationwide."

---

[Scene 4: Antifa's Global Reach]

Visuals: Global map highlighting countries with Antifa activity.

Narrator (Voiceover):
"Antifa operates both domestically and globally, aiming to undermine democracy, free speech, and capitalism—the very pillars of American liberty."

---

[Scene 5: White House Executive Order]

Visuals: Footage of President Trump signing an executive order.

Narrator (Voiceover):
"In response, the White House officially designated Antifa as a domestic terrorist organization, directing federal agencies to investigate and dismantle any illegal operations or funders linked to it."

---

[Scene 6: Exposing the Funders]

Visuals: Logos of organizations allegedly funding Antifa.

Narrator (Voiceover):
"Organizations such as Open Society, Tides Foundation, and others are reportedly channeling funds into Antifa's activities, raising questions about transparency and accountability."

---

[Closing Scene]

Visuals: Footage of peaceful protests and community engagement.

Narrator (Voiceover):
"While the fight for social justice is important, it's crucial to understand who is behind the movements and what their true intentions are. Stay informed, stay vigilant."

---

⏱️ 45-Second Video Script: "Who's Funding Antifa?"

[Opening Scene]

Visuals: Footage of Antifa protests.

Narrator (Voiceover):
"Antifa—a movement known for its anti-fascist stance. But who's funding their activities?"

---

[Scene 2: White House Roundtable]

Visuals: Footage of a White House roundtable discussion.

Narrator (Voiceover):
"At a recent White House roundtable, President Trump addressed concerns over Antifa's funding sources."

---

[Scene 3: Seamus Bruner's Briefing]

Visuals: Seamus Bruner speaking at the roundtable.

Narrator (Voiceover):
"Seamus Bruner revealed a network of dark-money NGOs and activist groups fueling unrest nationwide."

---

[Scene 4: White House Executive Order]

Visuals: Footage of President Trump signing an executive order.

Narrator (Voiceover):
"In response, the White House designated Antifa as a domestic terrorist organization, directing federal agencies to investigate and dismantle any illegal operations or funders linked to it."

---

[Closing Scene]

Visuals: Footage of peaceful protests.

Narrator (Voiceover):
"Understanding who's behind these movements is crucial. Stay informed."

---

📱 Social Media Post

Text:

"💥 Unmasking Antifa: Who's Funding the Chaos? 💥

At a recent White House roundtable, President Trump addressed concerns over Antifa's activities. Seamus Bruner, Director of Research at the Government Accountability Institute, revealed a complex network of dark-money NGOs and activist groups fueling unrest nationwide.

In response, the White House officially designated Antifa as a domestic terrorist organization, directing federal agencies to investigate and dismantle any illegal operations or funders linked to it.

🔗 Read the full article: https://itidingscurrentevents.blogspot.com/2025/10/whos-really-behind-antifa-unmasking.html

#Antifa #WhiteHouseRoundtable #SeamusBruner #DomesticTerrorism #DarkMoney #NGOs #ActivistGroups #FollowTheMoney #StayInformed"

X

Who’s funding Antifa? It’s not just “grassroots.” Dark money networks like Arabella Advisors, Sixteen Thirty Fund, & donors like Hansjörg Wyss are fueling these groups. 💰🔥 Stay informed, follow the money! https://bit.ly/3J5QsTK #Antifa #DarkMoney #PoliticalFunding #ExposeTheTruth

🔗 Full breakdown: 

Gaza Crisis Deepens as Trump and UN Clash on Solutions

Former U.S. President Donald Trump addressed the United Nations General Assembly in New York, calling for an immediate stop to the war in Gaza. He criticized recent recognition of Palestinian statehood by several Western countries, calling it a “reward” for Hamas, and emphasized the need to bring home the remaining 20 hostages still believed to be alive.

Trump urged world leaders to unite for peace and prioritize the safe return of captives, while blaming Hamas for rejecting previous ceasefire offers. Unlike UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, who hated Israel and is a global leftist who called Palestinian statehood “a right, not a reward,” Trump focused on stopping the conflict and negotiating peace. 

If Palestine gets their own state, I doubt it since it has been offered to them 5 other times. They do not want to share with Israel. They want to remove by killing as many Jews as they can to take over Israel completely. Islam is a cult, not a religion, and has no connections to Abraham or Ismael. 

Truth News, Teresa Morin

Watch the video

https://youtube.com/shorts/Daa7BEmGxKw?feature=share

Key progressive figures in America include politicians like Senators and others and purpose

 Key progressive figures in America include politicians like Senators, Globalists, NGOs, Leftist Businesses, etc. 

🔑 Summary

NGOs are powerful because they:

• Shift culture through education, activism, and media.

• Change laws through lobbying and funding “reform” candidates.

• Break down capitalism by painting it as racist, unjust, or unsustainable.

• Prepare the way for Marxism by conditioning society to accept collectivist solutions over individual freedom.

• Is Donald Trump part of this movement? Find out.

Key progressive figures in America include politicians like Senators Bernie Sanders and Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Rashida Tlaib, and Ilhan Omar, often referred to as members of "The Squad". They advocate for a range of progressive ideals, from economic and racial justice to climate action and healthcare reform. 

Prominent political players

• Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT): A long-serving independent senator, Sanders remains a major voice for progressive ideals. He has recently focused on shaping the Democratic Party from the left, advocating for working-class needs and progressive policies ahead of the 2026 midterms.
• Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY): A leading figure of the progressive movement in Congress. Her focus areas include advocating for the Green New Deal, Medicare for All, housing as a human right, and expanded access to reproductive rights.
• Representative Rashida Tlaib (D-MI): One of the first Muslim women elected to Congress, Tlaib is a strong advocate for issues including racial and economic justice, environmental justice, and LGBTQI+ rights. She has been particularly vocal on issues affecting her district, securing funds for community projects.
• Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN): As Deputy Chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, Omar has championed policies like the Green New Deal, Medicare for All, and housing for all. She has also focused on justice reform and immigration issues.
• Representative Pramila Jayapal (D-WA): As Chair Emerita of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, she continues to push for progressive legislation. Her focus areas include government reform, climate resilience jobs, and ending corporate influence on federal agencies.
• Representative Ro Khanna (D-CA): After the 2024 election, Khanna has renewed his call for an anti-corruption agenda, proposing reforms such as banning stock trading by members of Congress and banning former members from lobbying. He is also focused on "economic patriotism". 
Key organizations
• Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC): Composed of nearly 100 progressive members of the House and Senate, the CPC advocates for policies that prioritize working-class Americans over corporate interests. The caucus is led by Chairman Greg Casar (TX-35).
• Justice Democrats: This grassroots political action committee aims to elect a new generation of progressive leaders. Since 2018, they have helped elect prominent figures like Rashida Tlaib and Summer Lee.
• The Squad: An informal group of some of the most prominent progressive House members, including Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY-14), Ilhan Omar (MN-5), Ayanna Pressley (MA-7), and Rashida Tlaib (MI-12). Additional members have joined since the group's inception. 
• Prominent progressive organizations
  A wide network of organizations works to influence policy from outside of Congress. These groups engage in research, advocacy, and grassroots organizing. 
  • Justice Democrats: A political action committee (PAC) that supports progressive candidates and aims to elect a new generation of diverse, working-class leaders.
  • Center for American Progress (CAP): An independent, non-partisan think tank that develops progressive policy ideas and publishes research on issues affecting Americans.
  • Progressive Change Campaign Committee (PCCC): A grassroots organization focused on electing progressives and advocating for economic populist policies.
  • Our Revolution: A political organization formed from Bernie Sanders's 2016 presidential campaign, which works to elect progressive candidates at all levels of government. 
  Key progressive policy agenda points
  Progressive players in Congress and advocacy groups are currently pushing for legislation and action on several key issues. 
  • Economic Inequality: Policy priorities include raising the minimum wage, increasing taxes on corporations and the wealthy, and strengthening labor protections and union rights.
  • Healthcare: Progressives continue to advocate for reforms, such as moving towards a universal or single-payer healthcare system, also known as "Medicare for All".
  • Social Justice and Civil Rights: Efforts are focused on criminal justice reform, protecting voting rights, ensuring reproductive freedoms, and promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion. 

  • Sunrise Movement

    Youth-led climate justice organization. Advocates for the Green New Deal and organizing young people to pressure lawmakers. Democracy Alliance A network of major progressive donors who coordinate funding to progressive organizations and causes. Progressive International An international network of progressive, socialist, and left-wing groups that collaborate globally on issues like social justice, climate, anti-imperialism. Open Society Foundations (OSF), George Soros,  Criminal Justice Reform (funding prosecutors who support “decarceration” policies, opposing the death penalty, pushing bail reform). Immigration and Refugee Rights (advocates for more open borders, sanctuary policies, refugee resettlement). Democracy and Electoral Influence (voting rights groups, efforts to expand mail-in voting, oppose voter ID laws). Gender and LGBTQ+ Rights (global funding for abortion rights, transgender policies, anti-discrimination programs). Global Governance / International Law (funding groups that favor stronger international institutions over national sovereignty).   Influence in U.S. Politics Soros and OSF have poured hundreds of millions into U.S. politics. Key support goes to: Progressive district attorneys (e.g., in San Francisco, Philadelphia, Chicago, Los Angeles) who focus on criminal justice reform. Voting rights and election advocacy groups. Climate and racial equity initiatives. Often accused (especially by conservatives) of bankrolling the radical left agenda behind the scenes. Funding Progressive Grassroots Movements NGOs often act as middlemen for money—funding small grassroots groups that push Marxist-influenced ideas (class struggle, redistribution, anti-capitalist rhetoric). Influencing Education & Academia NGOs pour money into universities, “research” centers, and student movements. They promote critical theory (Critical Race Theory, gender ideology, decolonization narratives), which attack capitalism as racist and oppressive. This is how many young people in college shift from seeing capitalism as freedom → to seeing it as exploitation. Shaping Criminal Justice & Social Policy Through criminal justice reform campaigns, NGOs push for policies that reduce punishment, redistribute resources, and redefine justice in “equity” terms. The idea: dismantle “capitalist law and order” and replace it with collectivist / restorative justice models closer to Marxist frameworks. Controlling Media & Narrative Many NGOs fund independent media outlets, fact-checkers, and activist journalists. These groups shape public opinion by framing capitalism as harmful (climate change, inequality, worker exploitation) and portraying Marxist-style policies as “justice” or “progress.” They redefine terms: socialism becomes “democratic socialism,” redistribution becomes “equity,” censorship becomes “safety.” Policy Pressure on Government NGOs lobby legislators and influence international bodies (like the U.N.). They draft model legislation for climate policy, universal healthcare, or wealth redistribution. The effect: weaken private ownership, strengthen state control, and push America closer to socialist-style governance. Using Crises to Expand Control NGOs often capitalize on crises—climate change, pandemics, racial unrest. They push for “systemic solutions” that require massive government expansion and global coordination (classic Marxist goal: centralized control). Example: Climate NGOs argue capitalism is destroying the planet and only “planned economies” can save it. 7. Undermining National Identity & Faith Marxism thrives when people lose traditional anchors (faith, family, patriotism). Many NGOs fund programs that attack Christianity, promote secularism, or push identity politics. This weakens resistance to Marxism because the collective replaces God and family as the ultimate authority. What is the purpose of this: Funding Progressive Grassroots Movements NGOs often act as middlemen for money—funding small grassroots groups that push Marxist-influenced ideas (class struggle, redistribution, anti-capitalist rhetoric). many political leaders, past and present, are often associated with supporting parts of the progressive/globalist agenda that overlaps with NGO influence, though the degree and intent vary. Here’s a breakdown: . Hillary Clinton Role: Former Secretary of State, Democratic presidential candidate. Connections to NGOs / Globalist Agenda: Strong supporter of Open Society Foundations’ goals internationally and domestically. Advocated for climate treaties, global governance cooperation, and progressive social policies. Pushed policies that expand federal government programs, which critics say move the U.S. closer to collectivist models. Influence: Seen as a promoter of globalist and progressive policies, especially abroad through diplomacy and NGOs. 2. Barack Obama Role: Former President. Connections to NGOs / Globalist Agenda: Advocated for progressive social programs, universal healthcare (ACA), and global climate agreements (Paris Accord). Strengthened partnerships between the U.S. government and NGOs promoting social justice, environmentalism, and human rights. Encouraged youth activism and civic engagement, often funding programs aligned with “equity” and progressive policies. Influence: Criticized by conservatives for expanding federal power and internationalist agendas. 3. George W. Bush Role: Former President. Connections to NGOs / Global Influence: Advocated for faith-based initiatives, global health programs (e.g., PEPFAR f or HIV/AIDS), and humanitarian aid. While not a progressive like Clinton or Obama, some globalist critics say he supported policies that strengthened international institutions. Influence: Less aligned with Marxist/progressive ideology; more connected to humanitarian globalization, not socialist policy domestically. 4. Other Key Figures Joe Biden: Current President; pushed infrastructure spending, ESG policies, student loan forgiveness, and globalist/UN-aligned climate policies. Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer: Congressional leaders pushing progressive legislation, federal oversight, and social equity programs. Bill and Melinda Gates: Though not politicians, major philanthropists funding global health, climate, and education NGOs, aligning with progressive/globalist influence. Summary: Clinton and Obama: Actively support progressive/globalist agendas domestically and  internationally. Bush: More humanitarian/globalist than socialist; less aligned with Marxist objectives. Others (Biden, Pelosi, Gates, Schumer): Actively fund, legislate, or promote programs that expand government power and influence NGOs. Is Donald Trump Part of this movement? Donald Trump is not part of the left-progressive movement. In fact, he positions himself as one of the primary political leaders pushing back against progressive, globalist, and Marxist agendas in America. Here’s a breakdown of his role and actions: 1. Trump’s Position on Left-Progressive Agendas Opposes: Expansion of federal control over businesses and personal freedoms. Radical progressive policies in education (Critical Race Theory, gender ideology in schools). Open borders, mass immigration policies promoted by NGOs/globalists. Globalist treaties that weaken U.S. sovereignty (Paris Climate Accord, international agreements that prioritize other nations). Supports: Free-market capitalism, private property, and deregulation. Religious freedom and traditional family values. Strong borders, law enforcement, and national sovereignty. 2. Actions Trump Has Taken to Counter Progressive Influence Education & Schools Pushed for parents’ rights to challenge school curricula promoting Marxist or radical progressive ideas. Executive actions supporting school choice and limiting federal overreach in local education. Immigration & Borders Built border barriers to reduce illegal immigration. Restricted NGO-backed refugee resettlement programs seen as part of globalist influence. Government Regulation & Economic Policy Cut taxes, reduced regulations, promoted domestic manufacturing. Opposed ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) mandates that NGOs and globalists use to shift corporate policy toward progressive agendas. Cultural Influence Advocates for free speech, especially protecting conservative voices on campuses and media. Challenges corporate media and tech platforms perceived as enforcing progressive narratives. Judicial Appointments Appointed conservative judges at federal and Supreme Court levels to counter progressive rulings on abortion, religious freedom, and business regulations. 3. Big Picture Trump is considered a bulwark against left-progressive, globalist, and Marxist influence. His approach focuses on restoring sovereignty, capitalism, and traditional values, while rolling back programs funded or promoted by NGOs pushing progressive agendas.