Friday, September 19, 2025

NYC Protest: Sara Rose Sparks Anti-Charlie Kirk Chants

 Sara Rose Chanting in New York City Hatred

NYC Protest: Sara Rose Sparks Anti-Charlie Kirk Chants

  • Isaiah 5:20: "Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!"
  • This is what the progressive left through weaponizing social media with lies to get people to believe these lies and change their ideology to this. No respect to human life. See an example below:

"F**K Charlie Kirk"

"Racist bastard"

"Pss on your ashes"

"Spit on your grave"

"I'll never be a slave"

Wow, see the hate with the progressive left? So sad that people can celebrate the death of another human being. The erosion of America is sickening. There is a reason this is happening, and the outcome. 

Debunk the 5 lies against Charlie Kirk - 

This is an example of 36% of leftist Americans who are saying in colleges. 18.5 million going to  college, that makes over 6 million thinking and saying this that have hatred in their hearts to destroy traditions of American life. How about the rest of American people? Could it be as high as 30 million people who have such hatred to divide our country? and take away traditions, freedom of religion? See below on scriptures of indicators of how close to Christ return.

Campus speech disputes highlight growing tensions on college campuses. Protests and attempts to silence speakers reveal a shift away from free-speech principles, Christianity, and traditional American values among some younger progressives. Religious conservatives, including groups like the Christian Coalition, advocate for free speech to protect religious liberty, supporting student-led religious expression in voluntary settings. Meanwhile, the political left has been linked to coordinated messaging and scripted talking points, spreading false or misleading narratives—part of a broader trend of computational propaganda and social media manipulation used by political actors worldwide. Evidence confirms these tactics.



So to say, the left has weaponized the social media to spread lies. On youtube, many are being 
paid $10,000 to $20,000 to spread lies. 

The Oxford Internet Institute (OII) has extensively tracked "cyber troops" since at least 2017. Their 2020 report noted that government agencies, political parties, and private firms worldwide use social media to spread political propaganda. They found that professional "strategic communications" firms were playing a growing role, and that activities like using bots to spread messaging were occurring in dozens of countries.

General methods for spreading disinformation by the left: 
  • Private "disinformation-for-hire" firms are used by state actors and political parties to conduct propaganda campaigns.
  • Political parties or campaigns may use data-driven strategies to target specific users with political advertisements or messaging.
  • State-sponsored or political trolls are used to harass and attack political opponents or activists.
  • Content manipulation, such as using inflammatory language or "clickbait" headlines, is employed to attract attention and engagement, as social media platforms often reward this type of content.
  • Coordinated bot activity is used to create the false impression that certain messages are trending or widely supported.
Again, social media has been weaponized to go after the young people to create an army of haters. 

Then, universities were given grants to teach against capitalism. 
  • In 2024, the university offered a course titled "Critical Political Ecology/Economy: From Extraction to Regeneration," which examined capitalism's alleged failures and explored "(eco)feminism" and "(eco)Marxism" as alternative structures. 
  • Vanessa Wills, Associate Professor of Philosophy at George Washington University, is a Marxist scholar whose work addresses the ethical dimensions of economic inequality.
  • Darrick Hamilton, a professor at The New School, focuses on stratifications in wealth and racial inequality related to the U.S. economic system. 
George Soros, NGO's, progressive democrats know that if you divide a country, it will fall. The bigger picture is that there is a spiritual war going on to cause America and Europe to fall to do the great reset or reboot to another system that will rob everyone of their freedoms. That means monitoring people to the max, like they do in China. 

Evil is called good and good is called evil
The Bible describes a time when moral standards would be inverted, with people calling evil good and good evil. Isaiah 5:20 says, "Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!" Additionally, Malachi 2:17 indicates God's displeasure with those who claim that evildoers are good in the sight of the Lord. 
Lovers of self and money
According to 2 Timothy 3:1-5, the "last days" will be marked by people who are primarily "lovers of themselves". This self-centeredness is seen as the source of various negative behaviors. Philippians 2:21 also highlights a self-focused attitude, stating, "For everyone looks out for their own interests, not those of Jesus Christ." Furthermore, James 4:4 warns that worldliness is incompatible with devotion to God, and choosing to be a friend of the world makes one an enemy of God. 
Hatred
In Matthew 24:9-12, Jesus foretells the increase of hatred in the end times, noting that his followers will be persecuted and that the rise of lawlessness will cause love to diminish. John 15:18 adds that the world will hate Jesus' disciples because it hated him first. Micah 7:6 is also cited to illustrate the deep divisions and hatred that can emerge even within families during these times. 

Teresa Morin, Truth News




Thursday, September 18, 2025

Why are so many college students turning against capitalism, Christianity, and freedom?

Why are so many college students turning against capitalism, Christianity, and freedom?

Isaiah 5:20:

“Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness…”

Why are so many college students turning against capitalism, Christianity, and freedom?


Why are so many college students turning against capitalism, Christianity, and freedom? Because universities have become breeding grounds for Marxist ideology. Professors push the idea that capitalism is oppressive, Christianity is intolerant, and freedom is just ‘privilege.’ Add peer pressure, and students quickly conform.

This isn’t just theory—it’s rooted in Marxism, the same system that destroyed nations like Venezuela, Russia, and China. And it’s being reinforced by the Democratic Party’s socialist-leaning policies, NGOs, global donors, the media, and even public officials.

Right now, 18.5 million students are in college. That’s over 6 million young Americans being indoctrinated into Marxist thought. And studies show that 36% of Democrats and Republicans alike believe it’s okay to intimidate, silence, or even use violence against those they disagree with.

This is no accident. It’s a coordinated attack on truth, faith, and freedom—and we must expose it.

Watch the Video

Here are other reasons Marxism is spreading, capitalism is under attack, and Christianity is being called evil, with supporting Scriptures:

1. Spiritual Deception in the Last Days

  • Marxism fits the “strong delusion” warned about in 2 Thessalonians 2:10–12. It denies God, exalts man, and pushes false justice.

  • 2 Thessalonians 2:3“Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first…”


2. Hatred of Authority

  • Marxism rejects God’s order—family, church, and government—and pushes rebellion.

  • Psalm 2:2–3“The kings of the earth set themselves… against the LORD… saying, Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us.”


3. Love of Money / Envy of Wealth

  • Capitalism is being demonized because it produces inequality, and envy fuels Marxism.

  • James 3:16“For where envying and strife is, there is confusion and every evil work.”

  • 1 Timothy 6:10“For the love of money is the root of all evil…”


4. Hatred of Christianity’s Moral Restraint

  • Christianity calls for holiness, but Marxism promotes “freedom” from morality.

  • John 3:19–20“Men loved darkness rather than light… For every one that doeth evil hateth the light…”


5. Rise of Globalism (One-World System)

  • Marxism strips nations of sovereignty and paves the way for global governance.

  • Revelation 13:7“And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations.”


6. Rebellion Against God’s Design for Family & Gender

  • Marxism attacks marriage, gender roles, and children to destroy the family unit.

  • Genesis 1:27–28“So God created man in his own image… male and female created he them. And God blessed them…”

  • 1 Timothy 4:1–3“In the latter times some shall depart from the faith… forbidding to marry…”


7. Satan as the Architect

  • At the root, this is not political—it’s spiritual. Marxism is simply one of Satan’s tools to overthrow God’s truth.

  • John 10:10“The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy…”

  • Ephesians 6:12“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers…”


👉 In short: Marxism spreads because the world is deceived, envious, rebellious, and ripe for Satan’s agenda. Capitalism is attacked because it encourages freedom and responsibility. Christianity is hated because it exposes sin and points to Jesus Christ as the only way.

We need to pray—because there really is a Heaven and a Hell. Those who follow hate and reject God’s truth are on a path to eternal separation from Him.

Think about it: if I’m wrong, no one loses anything by choosing love, faith, and forgiveness. But if I’m right, and you choose hate, then you lose everything—forever.

Jesus said in John 14:6: “I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.”

Eternity is not a game. Choose wisely. Choose Christ.

Truth News, Teresa Morin

Wednesday, September 17, 2025

Why the Spirit of Hatred Proves Jesus’ Words Are Coming True

 Why the Spirit of Hatred Proves Jesus’ Words Are Coming True



🔥 Shocking but true: 29% of Democrats and 7% of Republicans believe it’s okay to kill others just to silence the truth of God. With 18.5 million students in college today, that adds up to nearly 6 million young people consumed by hate—calling evil good and good evil. ✝️ The Bible warns us this would happen in the last days. 💡 But as believers, we’re called to pray, love, and share the truth of Christ—even with those who hate us. 👉 What does God’s Word say about this? 📺 Watch the video now.

https://youtu.be/j6fRhOUTQfE


Truth News by Teresa Morin


Saturday, August 16, 2025

The Deep State No Longer a Conspiracy - see the proof and documents

The Deep State No Longer a Conspiracy - Video

The Deep State No Longer a Conspiracy - Video

The Release of the ODNI Report that Gives Insight into the Network

The episode delves into the concept of "deep state," revealing a network of bureaucrats, intelligence operators, NGOs, and global influencers. 

- The release of the ODNI report and the Durham Annex provides unprecedented insight into this network. 

- The show explores connections between the deep state and past geopolitical events, including the Russia hoax, Ukraine's 2014 revolution, and the Arab Spring. 

- The deep state is described as a real network of power players with little oversight, influencing elections and revolutions. 

- The ODNI report and Durham Annex reveal the inner workings of this network, previously undisclosed. - A self-reinforcing ecosystem is described, involving agencies like the CIA, FBI, NSA, and ODNI feeding intel to NGOs and think tanks. 

- These organizations produce reports that reinforce the desired narrative, which is then amplified by the media. 

- The narrative engineering is exemplified by the manipulation of the 2016 intelligence community assessment on Russian interference. 

- The episode details how Obama's security team reframed Russia as the antagonist, targeting Trump. 

- The process involves multiple layers of operation, from surveillance to media amplification, often based on unverified documents.

See pictures of people involved behind the Russia Conspiracy and other issues

See pictures of people involved behind the Russia Conspiracy and other issues


See where the money came from to create this coup against Trump and other dealings around the globe.

See where the money came from to create this coup against Trump and other dealings around the globe.

Watch the Video by Glenn Beck that puts it all together. 

The Deep State Machine covers: This board illustrates a "self-reinforcing ecosystem" of the deep state. It outlines a three-level system:

  • Level 1: Government agencies like the CIA, FBI, NSA, and ODNI, where intelligence is "fed" down to the next level.

  • Level 2: NGOs, think tanks, law firms, and defense contractors that "launder" the intelligence into what appear to be independent reports.

  • Level 3: The media, which amplifies the narrative using "anonymous sources." The chalkboard also details "levers of operation," including surveillance, election interference, funding, and media coordination.



Deep State Timeline This final chalkboard maps out a timeline of events from 2000 to 2016, showing a pattern of "US-backed interference" [30:30] using a "template" first established in Serbia. The timeline includes:

  • 2000: The Serbia "Bulldozer Revolution" [31:02].

  • 2003: Georgia's "Rose Revolution" [32:50].

  • 2004: Ukraine's "Orange Revolution" [33:14].

  • 2011: The "Arab Spring" [34:08].

  • 2014: Ukraine's "Maidan" Revolution [35:02].

  • 2012-2016: Macedonia [35:40].

  • 2016: The host states that "Russia Gate" was the "domestic flip" of this pattern [37:32].


 


The Durham Annex findings summary sheds light on the deep state report analysis and how entrenched power structures influence politics. At its core, the investigation revealed a bureaucratic power network spanning intelligence and law enforcement agencies, including the CIA, FBI, NSA, and ODNI.

Declassified Durham Report - Russiagate Scandale by Democrats to create a coup against Donald Trump. 

This hidden intelligence bureaucracy fed selective and often unverified document manipulation into a surveillance-to-media pipeline, ensuring narratives were amplified without thorough verification. The intelligence-media influence chain worked by supplying think tanks and NGOs with intel, which then produced reports. These were echoed by the press, creating a self-reinforcing NGO ecosystem that shaped public perception.

The report shows how this narrative engineering network reframed geopolitical issues, with Russia positioned as the primary antagonist. During the 2016 election cycle, this media manipulation deep state targeted Trump by weaponizing intelligence assessments.

Durham’s work uncovers how the deep state election influence extended beyond U.S. borders, impacting events such as the post-2014 Ukraine revolution and even feeding into the Arab Spring narrative amplification. The findings reveal a global influencers network deep state—a shadow system of power players with little oversight.

In short, the Durham Annex provides unprecedented insights into the think tank dynamics, intelligence narrative amplification, and media manipulation that continue to shape modern politics.



By Teresa Morin
Truth News

#deepstatereportanalysis, #ODNIDurhamfindingssummary, #narrativeengineeringnetwork, #intelligence-mediainfluencechain, #bureaucraticpowernetworkinsights, #surveillancetomediapipeline, #self-reinforcingNGOecosystem, #mediamanipulationdeepstate, #deepstatethinktankdynamics, #hiddenintelligencebureaucracy, #unverifieddocmanipulation, #deepstateelectioninfluence, #post-2014revolutiondeepstate, #intelligencenarrativeamplification, #globalinfluencersnetworkdeepstate,

Tuesday, August 12, 2025

Iran’s Internal Crisis and Threats Against Israel: Is a Surprise Attack Imminent?

Iran’s Internal Crisis and Threats Against Israel: Is a Surprise Attack Imminent?

Iran’s Internal Crisis and Threats Against Israel: Is a Surprise Attack Imminent?


  1. Iran’s Domestic Issues:
    Iran is indeed facing significant challenges at home, including water shortages, power outages, economic struggles, and widespread public discontent. These domestic issues are putting pressure on the government.

  2. Hostility Toward Israel & Threats:
    Iran's leadership, including figures like Supreme Leader Khamenei, has historically taken a strong, hostile stance against Israel. Statements and signals from Iranian political and military leaders often hint at possible attacks or escalations. The idea of Iran possibly planning a surprise or chemical attack is a concern frequently discussed by analysts and intelligence communities.

  3. Source of Iran’s Weapons:
    Iran develops and produces many of its own missiles and bombs domestically, including ballistic missiles and drones. Additionally, it has acquired weaponry through clandestine networks from allies and black markets. Its proxies, like Hezbollah in Lebanon and various militias in Syria and Iraq, also receive Iranian-supplied weapons, which can threaten Israel.

  4. The Role of Lobbyists & Messaging:
    Figures like Dr. Trita Parsi work to influence U.S. public opinion and policy on Iran. Signals of possible attacks can sometimes be part of political messaging, but intelligence agencies take such warnings seriously to prepare defenses.

  5. Iranian Leadership and Fear of Israel:
    Reports about Supreme Leader Khamenei’s security measures (like staying in bunkers) reflect the regime’s concern about retaliation from Israel, especially considering Israel’s advanced intelligence and military capabilities.

Summary:

Iran is indeed strained domestically, but maintains aggressive rhetoric and military buildup aimed at Israel. The country builds many of its weapons at home and through proxy networks, making it difficult to fully prevent the flow of armaments. The possibility of chemical or surprise attacks is taken seriously by Israel and its allies. Again, Iran, Islam, Shiite is all about murder and killing Israel at all cost even if it meant the citizens starve or cannot get water. Again, Islam is a death cult and not a religion. 

Even With Crime Drop, D.C. Still Outpaces Major Cities — Trump Orders Guard

Even With Crime Drop, D.C. Still Outpaces Major Cities — Trump Orders Guard

Even With Crime Drop, D.C. Still Outpaces Major Cities — Trump Orders Guard


Isn't it amazing that crime has gone down since Trump became president in DC? But the crime rates are still higher than in any other city. Yes, Trump has the right to fight the high crime. Based on data from July 2024, the population of Washington D.C. was 702,250 residents. Some sources also estimate the 2025 population to be around 717,176.

Many residents of Washington, D.C., have expressed significant concerns about crime in their neighborhoods. Despite official data indicating a decrease in citywide crime rates, local residents report feeling increasingly unsafe.WUSA9+1

A recent survey by Safety 7, focusing on Wards 7 and 8, revealed that most of the 150+ residents interviewed do not feel safe. Even if numbers are down, crime is the highest compared to New York City, Chicago, and Los Angeles. See statistics:

Violent crime in 2024 dropped by 35%, with homicides down 32%, robberies down 39%, and armed carjackings down 53%—the lowest violent crime levels in over 30 years.Department of Justice+1

As of mid-2025, violent crime remained down 26%, and overall crime down 8%, compared to 2024.Metropolitan Police DepartmentStatista

A regional dashboard covering DC, Maryland, and Virginia shows a 30% decline in homicides, 32% drop in robberies, 23% fewer rapes, and 21% fewer aggravated assaults in early 2025.MWCOG

However, in 2023, DC recorded 274 homicides, a 20-year high and significantly above years prior—raising the bar before the recent decline.WikipediaWUSA 9In per-capita terms, DC still ranks among the worst in the U.S.:

27.3 violent homicides per 100,000 residents in 2024—the fourth-highest in the countryThe White HouseThe Times

In 2023, DC had the highest violent crime rate among states/cities: 1,151 per 100,000 people, and the highest property crime rate at 4,307 per 100,000.USAFacts

The Fact is, the DC Crime is higher than New York City, Chicago and other big cities. See statistics:

Here’s the comparison picture:


📊 Violent Crime (per 100,000 residents, 2024–2025 data)

  • D.C. – ~1,150 (highest among U.S. states/major cities in 2023; still in the top tier in 2025)

  • Chicago – ~530 - the population is 2,721,308

  • New York City – ~370 -  the population is 8,478,072.

  • Los Angeles – ~480 - the population is 3,971,883

    (Source: USAFacts, FBI UCR, DC MPD)


🔪 Homicide Rate

  • D.C. – 27.3 per 100k in 2024 → among the top 4 in the U.S.

  • Chicago – 20.6

  • Philadelphia – 27.5

  • New York City – 5.4
    (Note: National average is ~6.3)


🚗 Property Crime

  • D.C. – ~4,300 per 100k (highest in the nation for 2023; still high in 2025)

  • Chicago – ~3,050

  • Los Angeles – ~2,780

  • New York City – ~1,750


📌 Why It’s Still Higher

  • Concentration of certain crimes – Carjackings, robberies, and burglaries remain more common than in many other big cities.

  • Population size effect – D.C.’s smaller population means a given number of crimes produces a higher per-capita rate.

  • Transit & tourism hubs – More non-residents in and out daily can raise property crime exposure.


💡 Bottom line:


While D.C. has seen major drops in violent crime since 2024, its per-capita rates are still higher than in New York, LA, or Chicago for many categories. The city is improving, but it hasn’t yet reached the safety levels of most other major metros.

While crime statistics may show a decline in certain areas, the lived experiences of D.C. residents suggest ongoing safety concerns. The debate over how best to address these issues continues, with differing opinions on the balance between local governance and federal intervention.

Traci Morin, Truth News



Sunday, August 10, 2025

U.S. Tariffs Before Trump: How Much Did America Pay and From Which Countries?

 U.S. Tariffs Before Trump: How Much Did America Pay and From Which Countries?

The exact amount America “loses” per day due to tariffs can vary widely depending on factors like trade volume, tariff rates, and retaliatory tariffs from other countries. But here are some key points to help understand the impact:

  1. Tariffs raise costs — U.S. importers pay more, which often leads to higher prices for American consumers and businesses. This can slow economic growth and reduce purchasing power.

  2. Retaliatory tariffs — Other countries often respond by imposing their own tariffs on U.S. exports, hurting American exporters and farmers.

  3. Estimates of losses

    • A 2019 Congressional Research Service report noted that the tariffs imposed during the trade war cost U.S. consumers and businesses about $1.7 billion per month in added costs, which is roughly $56 million per day.

    • The U.S. Chamber of Commerce estimated in 2020 that tariffs and retaliations cost the U.S. economy hundreds of billions of dollars annually.

  4. Trade deficit effect — Tariffs aimed to reduce the trade deficit with countries like China, but the deficit often persisted or even grew in some categories.

Summary:
While it’s hard to give a precise daily loss figure due to tariffs, estimates suggest that tariffs during the recent trade conflicts cost Americans tens of millions of dollars per day in higher costs and lost economic output.

1. China

  • Tariffs on U.S. goods:
    Initially started around 10% to 25% on about $250 billion worth of American imports.
    China retaliated with tariffs on about $110 billion of U.S. exports, typically between 5% and 25%.


2. European Union (EU)

  • Tariffs on U.S. goods:
    The EU imposed retaliatory tariffs ranging from 10% to 25% on approximately $7.5 billion worth of U.S. goods, including agricultural products, whiskey, and motorcycles.


3. Canada

  • Tariffs on U.S. goods:
    Canada retaliated with tariffs of around 10% to 25% on about $12.8 billion worth of U.S. goods, including steel, aluminum, and agricultural products.


4. Mexico

  • Tariffs on U.S. goods:
    Mexico imposed retaliatory tariffs roughly 5% to 25% on around $3 billion of U.S. imports, including steel, pork, and cheese.


5. India

  • Tariffs on U.S. goods:
    India imposed increased tariffs on approximately $230 million worth of U.S. goods, with rates reaching 10% to 50% on items like almonds, apples, and walnuts.


6. Turkey

  • Tariffs on U.S. goods:
    Turkey raised tariffs to 20% to 50% on about $1 billion of U.S. imports, including cars, alcohol, and tobacco.


7. Brazil

  • Tariffs on U.S. goods:
    Brazil imposed retaliatory tariffs between 10% and 20% on a smaller set of U.S. goods, including steel products.


Several reasons explain why previous administrations did not aggressively address tariff imbalances:

  1. Globalization Era Mindset:

    Since the 1980s and 1990s, the U.S. and many other nations embraced globalization. Leaders believed that integrated supply chains and free markets would maximize efficiency and innovation, despite growing trade deficits.
    Presidents pursued multinational agreements like NAFTA and joined the World Trade Organization (WTO) to establish rules and reduce tariffs globally, favoring negotiated compromises over unilateral action.
    Large multinational corporations, financial sectors, and some political constituencies benefited from open trade and often resisted protectionist measures. Lobbying and campaign contributions created incentives to maintain the status quo.
    Aggressive tariff policies risked retaliation from other countries, possibly sparking trade wars that could harm exporters and global economic stability, deterring many leaders.
    Trade issues are complex, with impacts unfolding over years or decades. Presidents with limited terms often prioritized immediate domestic issues like the economy, healthcare, or national security.
    Some leaders trusted that market forces and economic growth would eventually correct trade imbalances without disruptive interventions.

  2. Focus on Multilateral Trade Agreements:

  3. Political and Economic Pressures:

  4. Fear of Retaliation and Trade Wars:

  5. Complexity and Time Lag:

  6. Belief in Market Self-Correction:

Additional Notes:

  • The U.S. also imposed tariffs on steel and aluminum imports from many of these countries, typically 25% on steel and 10% on aluminum.

  • Many of these tariffs were part of the trade war aimed mainly at China but affected allies and partners through retaliations.

  • Some tariffs remain in place or were adjusted by the Biden administration, but many were negotiated or partially rolled back.