Jews Deserve Their Homeland and Are Ready to Share — But Arabs Resist

Historical Background

Ancient Connection:
- The Jewish people have a continuous historical and religious connection to the land of Israel dating back thousands of years.
- Ancient Israel and Judea were Jewish kingdoms until the Roman exile nearly 2,000 years ago.
Zionist Movement:
- In the late 19th century, Jews began organizing politically through the Zionist movement, seeking to reestablish a Jewish homeland in response to rising anti-Semitism and persecution in Europe.
British Mandate and the Balfour Declaration (1917):
- During World War I, Britain issued the Balfour Declaration, expressing support for a "national home for the Jewish people" in Palestine, while also promising to protect the rights of existing non-Jewish communities.
- After the war, Britain was granted the Mandate for Palestine by the League of Nations, tasked with administering the territory and facilitating the establishment of a Jewish homeland.
UN Partition Plan (1947):
- The United Nations proposed partitioning Palestine into separate Jewish and Arab states.
- The Jewish leadership accepted the plan; the Arab leadership rejected it, leading to conflict.
Establishment of Israel (1948):
- Israel declared independence on May 14, 1948.
- Neighboring Arab states attacked, resulting in the 1948 Arab-Israeli War.

Perspectives on "Deserving" Israel

Jewish Perspective:
- Jews view Israel as their historic homeland and see the establishment of the state as a legitimate return after centuries of exile and persecution, including the Holocaust.
- International endorsements like the Balfour Declaration and UN Partition are seen as legal affirmations of their right.
Arab/Palestinian Perspective:
- Palestinians and many Arabs see the establishment of Israel as a colonial imposition that disregarded the rights and claims of the Arab inhabitants.
- The displacement of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians (the Nakba) remains a deeply traumatic and unresolved issue.

Summary

The creation of Israel was based on historical ties, international legal endorsements, and the Zionist movement’s efforts.
Whether the Jews "deserved" Israel is often debated, but legally and historically, the state was established through recognized international processes.
The situation is deeply complex, with legitimate grievances on both sides.

If you want, I can provide more detailed history or perspectives from both sides, or explain the ongoing challenges related to Israel and Palestine. Would that help?

As of 2023, there are approximately 2.1 million Arab citizens living in Israel, constituting about 21% of the country's total population. These individuals are full citizens of Israel, enjoying the same legal rights as Jewish citizens, including the right to vote, run for office, and access public services. Wikipedia+2Everything Explained Today+2Wikipedia+2

Demographic Breakdown

Muslims: Approximately 83% of Arab citizens identify as Sunni Muslims.
Christians: Around 8% are Christians, predominantly Eastern Orthodox and Catholic denominations.
Druze: About 9% are Druze, a unique religious and ethnic group. Wikipedia+1WorldAtlas+1WorldAtlas

Identity and Civic Engagement

While these citizens hold Israeli citizenship, their sense of identity is complex. Many identify as both Arab or Palestinian and Israeli, reflecting a dual sense of belonging. In recent years, there has been a trend toward greater political participation, with Arab political parties joining governing coalitions, such as the United Arab List in 2021. The iCenter+2Wikipedia+2Everything Explained Today+2New York Post+2Everything Explained Today+2Wikipedia+2

Challenges and Disparities

Despite their citizenship, Arab citizens of Israel often face socio-economic disparities compared to Jewish citizens. These include differences in income, education, healthcare access, and representation in government. Additionally, some Arab communities, particularly the Bedouins in the Negev, experience challenges related to land rights and infrastructure development. Wikipedia+1Le Monde.fr+1

Summary

Arab citizens of Israel are full citizens with legal rights equal to those of Jewish citizens. They contribute to Israeli society in various fields, including politics, education, and healthcare. However, they continue to navigate complex identity issues and work toward greater equality and integration within the state.

Many people see the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through the lens of ongoing security concerns, and it’s true that Israel often finds itself on the defensive due to hostile rhetoric and attacks from some groups that reject its right to exist.

From a broad perspective:

Some militant groups and factions within parts of the Muslim world have openly called for the destruction of Israel, which contributes to Israel’s heightened security posture.
At the same time, many Muslims and Arabs do not hold such extreme views and seek peaceful coexistence.
The history of conflict, wars, and terrorism has led Israel to maintain strong defense measures to protect its citizens.

So, while Israel often is on the defensive in security terms, the situation is complex with a wide spectrum of attitudes and efforts toward peace on both sides.

Golda Meir’s statement — "Peace will come when the Arabs start to love their children more than they hate us" — reflects her view of the Israeli-Arab conflict as deeply rooted in longstanding animosities and cycles of violence, where hatred toward Israel overshadowed concerns for the future and safety of Arab children. Here’s some context to understand why she might have said this, and how it resonates today, especially in Gaza:

What Golda Meir Saw Leading to That Statement

Prolonged Hostility and Wars
- During her time (Prime Minister 1969–1974), Israel had already fought several wars with neighboring Arab states (1948, 1956, 1967, and later 1973).
- Many Israeli leaders, including Meir, believed that deep-seated hatred, rather than pragmatic concerns for peace or welfare, fueled ongoing conflicts.
Cycles of Retaliation and Violence
- Meir perceived that political leaders and groups prioritized resistance or hostility over the well-being of their own people, including children.
- She believed that hatred toward Israel resulted in continued conflict that cost countless Arab and Israeli lives — especially among children.
Impact on Arab Societies, Including Gaza
- Gaza has long been a focal point of conflict, suffering from wars, blockades, and internal strife.
- Many children in Gaza have grown up amid violence, poverty, and trauma — a reality Meir likely foresaw as the consequence of unresolved hatred.

Why It’s Still Relevant Today in Gaza

The Human Cost of Conflict
Gazan children continue to suffer due to ongoing conflict, political instability, and economic hardship.
Cycles of Hatred and Revenge
Deep animosity between some factions in Gaza and Israel perpetuates violence, overshadowing efforts to protect or improve children’s lives.
Calls for Prioritizing Future Generations
Meir’s quote urges a shift — that peace depends on putting the safety and well-being of children above political or ideological hatred.

Summary

Golda Meir’s statement reflects the painful reality that hatred and conflict harm innocent children on all sides. It’s a call to prioritize love, protection, and hope for future generations over ongoing enmity. In Gaza today, where many children endure hardship and violence, this message remains tragically relevant.

Deaths Related to Jewish-Arab Conflict Before 1948

Intercommunal Violence (1920s–1947)
- There were several outbreaks of violence between Jewish and Arab communities during the British Mandate period.
- Notable incidents:
  - 1920 Nebi Musa Riots: Around 5–10 Jews and dozens of Arabs killed.
  - 1921 Jaffa Riots: Approximately 47 Jews and 48 Arabs killed.
  - 1929 Palestine Riots (Hebron Massacre): Around 133 Jews and 116 Arabs killed.
  - 1936–1939 Arab Revolt: Over 5,000 Arabs, around 400 Jews, and hundreds of British killed during the revolt and British crackdown.
British Forces and Other Deaths
- British soldiers and policemen also died during these periods of unrest and military operations.

Estimated Total Jewish Deaths Before 1948

Jewish deaths related to the conflict and riots during the Mandate period are roughly estimated at around 600 to 700.

Since Israel declared independence in 1948, it has been involved in several major wars and numerous conflicts. Here's an overview of the main wars, along with estimates of Jewish (Israeli) deaths during those wars and in related conflicts:

Major Wars Involving Israel

1948 Arab-Israeli War (War of Independence / Nakba)
- Triggered immediately after Israel declared independence.
- Fought against armies from Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, and Iraq.
- Israeli deaths: Approximately 6,000 (about 1% of the Jewish population at the time).
1956 Suez Crisis (Second Arab-Israeli War)
- Israel, with Britain and France, attacked Egypt after Egypt nationalized the Suez Canal.
- Israeli deaths: Around 231.
1967 Six-Day War
- Israel fought Egypt, Jordan, and Syria.
- Israel gained control of Jerusalem, the West Bank, Gaza, Sinai Peninsula, and Golan Heights.
- Israeli deaths: Approximately 776.
1973 Yom Kippur War
- Egypt and Syria launched a surprise attack on Israel on Yom Kippur.
- Heavy fighting on Sinai and Golan fronts.
- Israeli deaths: Around 2,800.
1982 Lebanon War
- Israel invaded southern Lebanon to expel the PLO.
- Prolonged conflict and occupation.
- Israeli deaths: Around 657.
First Intifada (1987-1993)
- Palestinian uprising against Israeli occupation.
- Mostly civil unrest but with casualties.
- Israeli deaths: Hundreds (exact numbers vary).
Second Intifada (2000-2005)
- More intense Palestinian uprising with many attacks.
- Israeli deaths: Around 1,000.
2006 Lebanon War
- Conflict with Hezbollah.
- Israeli deaths: About 165.
Gaza Wars (2008-09, 2012, 2014, 2021, and others)
- Multiple conflicts with Hamas and other groups.
- Israeli deaths: Several hundred across these conflicts.

Total Israeli (Jewish) Deaths in Wars and Conflicts

Estimates range between 12,000 to 15,000 Israeli military and civilian deaths since 1948 due to war, terrorism, and conflicts.

The Unprecedented Civilian-to-Combatant Ratio in the Gaza Conflict

In a shocking development, the Gaza Health Ministry has announced that the total death count in Gaza has reached a staggering 21,720. Out of this harrowing number, an estimated 13,000 are believed to be militants, according to IDF estimates. This means that only 8,720 of the deceased are civilians, highlighting an unprecedented civilian-to-combatant ratio of 1:1. Out of the 8,720 since April 9, how many were killed by Hamas?

When Israel, before it bombs a building, searches first, they find elderly and sick Muslims chained to their beds. Israel rescues them and takes them to a safe place so that they do not get hurt or killed.

A Rare Occurrence in Modern Warfare

The United Nations reports that in conventional warfare, civilians typically make up around 90 percent of casualties, resulting in a 1:9 ratio of civilian to combatant deaths. However, the current conflict in Gaza presents a stark contrast with the IDF's less than 1:1 ratio.

The Complexity of Urban Warfare

One key factor that must be considered in analyzing this unique situation is the urban environment in which the conflict occurs. Hamas, the militant group in control of Gaza, often operates within civilian populations, using them as human shields to evade detection and attacks. This complicates the ability of the IDF to target militants without causing harm to innocent bystanders.

Hamas, since it took over the Gaza Strip, has continuously shot missiles at Israel. They never wanted a partide. They would rather kill the Jews so that they could have all of Israel.

Unprecedented Precision or Unintended Consequences?

The IDF's ability to maintain less than a 1:1 civilian-to-combatant ratio is impressive. On one hand, it demonstrates precision and restraint that is rarely seen in modern warfare. When America went into Iraq, they had a 9:1 ratio. They killed over 250,000 civilians. That means a much larger death of civilians than Israel has in a very high populated Gaza area.

The Moral and Ethical Dilemma

As the conflict in Gaza continues to escalate, the international community is faced with a moral and ethical dilemma. How can we reconcile the need to combat terrorism with the imperative to protect innocent lives? Is the sacrifice of civilian lives justified in the pursuit of militant targets, or are there alternative strategies that could minimize collateral damage?

Conclusion: A New Chapter in Warfare?

The unprecedented civilian-to-combatant ratio in the Gaza conflict raises profound questions about the nature of modern warfare. We have never seen such a precise ratio in any previous conflict, challenging our assumptions about the realities of war. As the world watches the events unfolding in Gaza, we are forced to confront the complexities and dilemmas of urban warfare in the 21st century. Maybe American soldiers or other soldiers around the world need to learn from Israel. Israel has the right to defend itself.

In summary, the unique civilian-to-combatant ratio in the Gaza conflict highlights modern warfare's complex challenges and ethical considerations. As the death toll continues to increase, the international community must grapple with the difficult questions raised by this unprecedented situation. The world is watching, and the choices made in Gaza may shape future conflict and peacekeeping efforts for years to come.

Look at Ukraine? Over 600,000 soldiers and civilians have died. That is a big number when there is no way Ukraine can win a war against Russia.

By: Traci Morin, Wake Up News

Sunday, August 3, 2025