PAGES | Iran's Global Agenda | Israel / Palestinian Truth | The Prophetic Word Section | Humanitarian Crisis Globally | Global Events (Weather, Earthquakes, Volcanoes
Thursday, March 21, 2024
Texas Border Crisis
Monday, March 11, 2024
Biden Needs to Stand with Israel in Rafah
The American Administration's Stance on Weapons Use in Rafah
In a recent leak to the Washington Post, the American administration hinted at a potential policy that could have far-reaching implications for the ongoing conflict in Rafah. The message suggested that the US is considering not allowing the use of American weapons in any operation in the region. But what does this mean for the future of the conflict? Let's take a closer look at the implications of this leaked message.
Biden's Weakness and Outside Influence
Many experts have pointed out that President Biden's approach to the situation in Rafah has been influenced by various factors, including pressure from other nations and groups. This has led to speculation that the American administration is not fully committed to supporting the complete destruction of Hamas, the militant group that controls the region.
The leaked message to the Washington Post seems to confirm these suspicions, as it suggests that the US may be hesitant to provide weapons that could potentially be used in an operation that aims to eliminate Hamas from Rafah. This has raised concerns among those who support a more aggressive approach to dealing with the group. Israel deserves to live and eliminate Hamas regardless of what traitor Joe has to say.
The Implications of the US Stance
If the American administration follows through with its rumored policy, it could have significant implications for the conflict in Rafah. Without access to American weapons, any operation against Hamas would likely be much more complex and potentially less effective. This could prolong the conflict and lead to more casualties on both sides.
Furthermore, the US stance could also have broader implications for the region. It could signal a shift in American foreign policy towards a more cautious and restrained approach to conflicts in the Middle East. This could embolden other groups and nations in the region, knowing that the US may not fully support aggressive actions against them.
Is Biden's Approach the Right One?
Many experts have debated whether President Biden's approach to the situation in Rafah is the right one. Some argue that a more cautious and diplomatic approach is needed to avoid further escalation and potential backlash. Others believe a more aggressive stance is necessary to deal with Hamas effectively and bring stability to the region. Biden pulling weapons from Israel would hurt the war effort for Israel to clean and get rid of Hamas for peace in the area.
Ultimately, the leaked message to the Washington Post raises essential questions about the direction of American foreign policy in the Middle East. Will the US continue to prioritize diplomacy and restraint, or will it take a more aggressive approach to regional conflicts? Only time will tell. There is no other solution but to get rid of Hamas and its proxies in Iran. Iran hates Jewish people and wants to eliminate them from the earth; second, all Christians do not bow down to Allah. Allah is a cult religion. They do not serve the same God as Abraham.
In conclusion, the leaked message to the Washington Post regarding the use of American weapons in Rafah has sparked a debate about the US stance on the conflict. The implications of this potential policy could have far-reaching effects on the region, and it remains to be seen how President Biden will navigate this challenging situation. The fact is, he needs to resist outside influences and stand by what he originally agreed to with Israel.
by: Traci Morin, Wake Up News
Forces from the 7th Brigade Combat Team Target Terrorists in Khan Younis
Forces from the 7th Brigade Combat Team Target Terrorists in Khan Younis
In the ongoing battle against terrorism, the forces from the 7th Brigade Combat Team have been relentless in their efforts to root out and eliminate threats in the Khan Younis area. Over the past 24 hours, the brave soldiers have conducted raids on multiple terrorist targets, making significant discoveries along the way.
Discovery of a Terrorist Warehouse
During their operations, the forces uncovered a warehouse that was being utilized to produce weapons, explosives, and military equipment. This disturbing find underscores the importance of targeting these terrorist facilities to prevent further harm and destruction.
Uncovering Mines in the Pirim Area
In addition to the warehouse discovery, the forces also stumbled upon mines in the Pirim area. The 7th Brigade Combat Team has undoubtedly saved countless lives and prevented potential tragedies by discovering and neutralizing these deadly traps.
Destruction of Terrorist Headquarters
The relentless commitment of the commando squad led to the successful destruction of the headquarters of terrorist organizations in the Gaza Strip. This decisive blow strikes a significant blow to the terrorist network and disrupts its ability to plan and carry out attacks against innocent civilians.
Elimination of Terrorists in Al-Qarar Area
In a daring attack in the Al-Qarar area, the Bislah brigade combat team (828) quickly sprang into action. Identifying six armed terrorists who had infiltrated a military building, the fighters engaged and eliminated the threat, preventing a potential attack on military personnel and civilians.
In conclusion, the forces' efforts from the 7th Brigade Combat Team in Khan Younis have been crucial in dismantling terrorist threats and safeguarding the region. Their unwavering dedication and expertise have proven invaluable in the ongoing fight against terrorism. With each successful raid and elimination of terrorists, the 7th Brigade Combat Team brings us one step closer to a safer and more secure future. The brave soldiers deserve our utmost respect and gratitude for their sacrifices and commitment to protecting our communities.
The good news is that Israel is winning to get rid of Hamas, a terrorist group connected with Iran, as proxies to destroy Israel.
Remember, the fight against terrorism is ongoing, and our support for the brave men and women of the 7th Brigade Combat Team is more important than ever. Through their courage and expertise, they are making a difference in the battle against terror. Let us stand in solidarity with our troops as they continue protecting and defending our freedoms.
by: Traci Morin, Wake Up News
Yemen Witnessing the Death of Shrimp
The Coasts of Mahra Governorate in Eastern Yemen Witnessing the Death of Shrimps
The coasts of Mahra governorate in eastern Yemen have recently been in the spotlight, with reports of a mass die-off of shrimps along the beaches. According to Yemen News Portal, local sources have confirmed the presence of tons of dead shrimp spread along the shores of Hawf district, east of Al-Mahra governorate, stretching for kilometers.
Possible Causes of Mass Shrimp Die-Off
The incident has raised concerns about potential marine pollution, which could lead to the death of a significant number of shrimp and other marine creatures. Sources speculate that foreign warships operating near the coast of the directorate could be responsible for disposing of toxic waste into Yemeni waters, causing ecological harm. Not only that, but Huthies also sunk a fertilizer ship.
Impact of Marine Pollution
The presence of toxic waste in the waters near Mahra governorate could have widespread implications for marine life in the region. Shrimps are an essential part of the aquatic ecosystem and play a crucial role in maintaining the balance of the underwater environment. Their sudden and widespread die-off could disrupt the food chain and have cascading effects on other marine species. Many people in Yemen are starving from the war against Huthies and Saudi Arabia. Approximately 90% of the people lack food.
Lack of Official Oversight
One of the main concerns highlighted by the incident is the absence of a regulatory authority to monitor and investigate potential environmental degradation causes along the Mahra governorate's coasts. With proper oversight and enforcement measures, foreign vessels might refrain from engaging in harmful practices without being held accountable.
Addressing the Issue
Collaborative Efforts
Local authorities, environmental organizations, and international stakeholders must collaborate and take proactive measures to address marine pollution and prevent similar incidents in the future. These could include conducting regular water quality assessments, implementing stricter regulations on waste disposal, and raising public awareness about the importance of marine conservation.
by: Traci Morin, Wake Up News
Local Community Involvement
Involving local communities in the monitoring and protection of coastal areas can also play a significant role in safeguarding the marine environment. By empowering residents to report any suspicious activities or changes in marine life, authorities can gather valuable information and respond swiftly to potential threats.
Advocacy for Sustainable Practices
Advocacy efforts aimed at promoting sustainable fishing practices and responsible tourism along the coasts of Mahra governorate can help reduce the pressure on marine resources and minimize the risk of pollution. By encouraging eco-friendly initiatives and supporting conservation projects, stakeholders can contribute to the long-term health and vitality of the marine ecosystem.
Conclusion
The recent mass die-off of shrimps along the coasts of Mahra governorate in eastern Yemen is a stark reminder of the fragility of marine ecosystems and the need for urgent action to protect them. By addressing the root causes of marine pollution, enhancing cross-sectoral cooperation, and advocating for sustainable practices, it is possible to mitigate the threats facing the coastal environment and ensure the well-being of marine life for future generations.
Meta Description:
Rephra
The World and the Palestinians Don't Get It
The World of Pro-Palestinians Don't Get It
Anti-Israel protester destroys painting of Lord Balfour, who paved way for modern Israeli state
Sick and evil people
A pro-Palestinian protester destroys a painting of Lord Balfour at the University of Cambridge. Who is Lord Balfour? He was one of the planners to create a country for Israel, only for Israel, until the Arab countries threatened to cut off oil to the UK. Then, decided to divide the state, which will never happen, nor will it ever work. Jordan was supposed to be a state for the Palestinians.
As foreign secretary in the Lloyd George ministry, he issued the Balfour Declaration of 1917, which supported a "home for the Jewish people. What do they not get?
Sunday, March 10, 2024
Netanyahu Claps Back at Erdogan's Comparison to Hitler
Netanyahu Claps Back at Erdogan's Comparison to Hitler and Stalin
In a recent verbal spat between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, tensions escalated as Erdogan compared Netanyahu to infamous historical figures Hitler and Stalin - an evil comparison. In response, Netanyahu fired back, asserting Israel's commitment to upholding the laws of war and rejecting any moral high ground claimed by Erdogan, whom he accused of supporting violent extremists and perpetrating atrocities in his own country. The Turkish government has killed many innocent people in Syria, Turkey, and Iraq, mainly the Kurds.
Erdogan's Provocative Comparison
Erdogan's comparison of Netanyahu to Hitler and Stalin came as a shock to many, sparking outrage and condemnation from Israeli officials and the international community. By equating the Israeli Prime Minister to two of the most notorious dictators in history, Erdogan sought to delegitimize Netanyahu's leadership and undermine Israel's stance on various geopolitical issues, particularly regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Netanyahu's Defiant Response
Netanyahu wasted no time in firing back at Erdogan, calling out the Turkish president for his support of Hamas, a designated terrorist organization responsible for countless attacks against Israeli civilians. Netanyahu highlighted Erdogan's denial of the Armenian Genocide, a dark chapter in history that Erdogan has been accused of whitewashing, as well as the ongoing Kurdish massacres in Turkey carried out under Erdogan's watch.
Israel's Stance on Moral Authority
In his scathing retort, Netanyahu made it clear that Israel, a nation founded on the principles of democracy and the rule of law, would not accept moral preaching from a leader like Erdogan, who has been widely criticized for his autocratic tendencies and human rights abuses. By exposing Erdogan's track record of supporting extremist groups and suppressing dissent, Netanyahu sought to portray Israel as a beacon of morality in a region plagued by violence and oppression. Muslim Islamists are haters and killers of anyone and anything.
International Reaction and Fallout
The war of words between Netanyahu and Erdogan has not gone unnoticed on the global stage, with world leaders weighing in on the escalating rhetoric between the two leaders. While some have condemned Erdogan's inflammatory remarks, others have called for restraint and de-escalation to prevent further deterioration of relations between Israel and Turkey.
Looking Ahead: A Call for Diplomacy
As tensions simmer between Israel and Turkey, both sides must prioritize dialogue and diplomacy in resolving their differences and avoiding further escalation. The Truth is, you cannot trust a Muslim head. Israel does everything is diplomacy. Turkey needs to instead resort to incendiary rhetoric and personal attacks; leaders like Erdogan must engage in respectful and constructive communication to address their grievances and work towards a peaceful resolution.
The US Government: An Obstacle in Destroying Hamas?
The U.S. Government: An Obstacle in Destroying Hamas?
Learn why the U.S. government is hindering the destruction of Hamas, creating a divide between Israel and Gaza. Is Netanyahu the key to peace?
Introduction:
In the ongoing conflict between Israel and Gaza, a new player has emerged as a significant obstacle on the path to destroying Hamas - the U.S. government. But why is this the case? Let's delve deeper into the dynamics and explore the situation's complexities.
The U.S. Government's Role (No understanding of Hamas).
The U.S. government's approach toward the Israel-Gaza conflict has been a topic of debate and contention. Many argue that their support for Israel is hindering efforts to truly neutralize Hamas. But why is this the case? Israel has the right to defend itself. Israel wants to eliminate Hamas and rebuild a better life for Palestinians.
The Reality of the Situation:
One of the critical issues at hand is the perceived difference between the leadership of Hamas and the Palestinian people. The U.S. government and other international players have been quick to highlight this supposed separation. But is this really the case?
Netanyahu's Victory and its Implications:
It is important to note that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu won a democratic election in Israel. This victory represents the will of the Israeli public, highlighting their support for his leadership. In fact, Netanyahu is now viewed as more moderate compared to the hardline stance that many Israelis hold towards Gaza. So, is there a fundamental disagreement between Israel and Gaza?
The Truth About Gaza and Israel:
When we look closer at the situation, it becomes clear that Gaza is essentially Hamas. The militant group exerts significant control and influence over the region, shaping its policies and actions. On the other hand, Israel, led by Netanyahu, is striving for peace and stability in the region. So, why is there a disconnect in how these entities are perceived? It is all about money and oil.
Moving Forward:
To truly address the Israel-Gaza conflict and neutralize Hamas, it is crucial to acknowledge the realities at play. The U.S. government must reconsider its stance and approach toward the situation, recognizing the need for a nuanced and balanced strategy. Progress can be made in this longstanding conflict only through collaboration, understanding, and a commitment to peace. America wants to be on the good side of Iran. Hamas is run by Iran. We get oil from Iran.
In conclusion, the U.S. government's role in the Israel-Gaza conflict is complex and multifaceted. By understanding the dynamics at play and acknowledging the realities on the ground, we can work towards a peaceful resolution and proper stability in the region. America needs to allow Netanyahu to do his job to bring peace to the region and peace to Palestinians, which could lead to a two-state solution.
Remember, Hamas is Gaza, and Netanyahu represents Israel's desire for peace. Let's work towards a future where mutual understanding and cooperation prevail over division and conflict.
The U.S. has threatened the end of supplying weapons to Israel. The U.S. won't stop. It is money to the American government. We make money in war since we no longer sell oil.
by: Traci Morin, Wake Up News